VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 123[4] ]
Subject: So, is the nuke really missing?


Author:
Kathyrn
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 03:55:04 03/04/02 Mon
Author Host/IP: 209.240.222.131
In reply to: me 's message, "Wow, peoples, this is unbelievable!!!!...." on 00:06:48 03/04/02 Mon

>This article From Time Magazine...
>
>www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,214064,00.html
>
>The Russkies "lost" a 10 kiloton nuclear weapon...
>
>Can We Stop the Next Attack?
>Six months after Sept. 11, America has taken the fight
>to al-Qaeda. But behind the scenes, The CIA and FBI
>have been in a desperate scramble to fix a broken
>system before another strike comes
>Sunday, Mar. 03, 2002
>For a few harrowing weeks last fall, a group of U.S.
>officials believed that the worst nightmare of their
>lives—something even more horrific than 9/11—was about
>to come true. In October an intelligence alert went
>out to a small number of government agencies,
>including the Energy Department's top-secret Nuclear
>Emergency Search Team, based
>in Nevada. The report said that terrorists were
>thought to have obtained a 10-kiloton nuclear weapon
>from the Russian arsenal and planned to smuggle it
>into New York City. The source of the report was a
>mercurial agent code-named dragonfire, who
>intelligence officials believed was of
>"undetermined" reliability. But dragonfire's claim
>tracked with a report from a Russian general who
>believed his forces were missing a 10-kiloton device.
>Since the mid-'90s, proliferation experts have
>suspected that several portable nuclear devices might
>be missing from the Russian stockpile. That made the
>dragonfire report alarming. So did this: detonated in
>lower Manhattan, a
>10-kiloton bomb would kill some 100,000 civilians and
>irradiate 700,000 more, flattening everything in a
>half-mile diameter. And so counterterrorist
>investigators went on their highest state of alert.
>
>"It was brutal," a U.S. official told Time. It was
>also highly classified and closely guarded. Under the
>aegis of the White House's Counterterrorism Security
>Group, part of the National Security Council, the
>suspected nuke was
>kept secret so as not to panic the people of New York.
-----------------------------------------------------

I can understand them trying to keep it a secret although, I don't like it!

This may explain why the high tech nuke detector's have been placed all over. Especially, at our borders...

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:
Subject Author Date
Re: So, is the nuke really missing?me20:19:46 03/08/02 Fri


[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.