VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Tue, April 23 2024, 21:21:27Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 123[4]56 ]


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: Fri, April 27 2007, 18:52:08
Author: Jeff Northridge
Author Host/IP: adsl-75-45-102-246.dsl.scrm01.sbcglobal.net / 75.45.102.246
Subject: Re: Vietnam War
In reply to: William 's message, "Vietnam War" on Wed, April 25 2007, 14:15:23

Howdy William;

Yes, so-called "collateral damage" is an unfortunate but inevitable consequence of war. Have you ever wondered why the U.S. prefers to fight her wars on somebody else's piece of dirt? The average ratio of civilian to combatant deaths during the wars of the 20th Century is about 3 to 1 and most of those (except for the Holocaust) were unintentional (the intentional killing of "protected persons" is a war crime). I can assure you that nobody feels very good when a non-combatant is killed by accident.

I can remember a little four-year-old boy who got scarred, darted across the road towards his mother, and was run over and killed by the APC in front of mine because the driver couldn't stop in time. Everybody in my platoon felt sick about it and couldn't eat dinner that evening.

The ratio of civilian to combatant casualties is slowly improving due to "smart weapons" which are much more accurate than what was available during the War in Vietnam. This does not apply to terrorists who (by definition) deliberately target non-combatants.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Login ] Create Account Not required to post.
Post a public reply to this message | Go post a new public message
* HTML allowed in marked fields.
Post Password:
Keep password cookie for 24 hours

Message subject (required):

Name (Registered users only):

  Expression (Optional mood/title along with your name) Examples: (happy, sad, The Joyful, etc.) help)

  E-mail address (required):

Type your message here:

Choose Message Icon: [ View Emoticons ]

Notice: Copies of your message may remain on this and other systems on internet. Please be respectful.

[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.