PAUL-After all you deny Gods word the bible,just because of your sexual preference,so if you cast the bible aside,you cast Jesus aside and he in turn will cast you aside.
>David
>
>I agree with you, we become two witnesses for the
>truth. You are right, and I hop that many people will
>believe it.
>
>Jesus said that no prophet or new law shall come after
>John the Baptist. So what Paul is doing with the
>apostles? Jesus said in Luke 16: 16 that the laws and
>the prophets preached until John the Baptist.
>We know that Paul was preaching about the New
>Testaments “the Gospel of Jesus Christ”. Paul’s
>teaching is about abolishing God’s law through Jesus
>Christ.
>
>The scripture reads:
>Jesus said: The law and the prophets were until John,
>since that time the kingdom of God preached and every
>man press into it, Luke 16: 16 to 17.
>
>So, how Paul could preach a new covenant to abolish
>God’s law through Jesus’ death after John the Baptist
>in 15 years. Was Jesus joking when he said it in Luke
>16: 16?
>
>Some people interpret this scripture in the way that
>the law doesn’t exist any more. They believe that the
>people obeyed God’s law until John the Baptist. Since
>then no one is under God’s law.
>
>But the real meaning of this scripture that is in Luke
>16: 16 to 17, that no other prophets could add or
>abolish God’s laws, the law was given until John and
>no one could change it. It doesn’t mean that we are
>not under the law. Jesus said also: IT IS EASIER FOR
>HEAVEN AND EARTH TO PASS THAN ONE TITLE OF THE LAW TO
>FAIL, Luke 16: 17.
>It means also that the Prophets shall not be in
>existence after John the Baptist. So in what category
>could we place Paul according to Jesus’ saying that
>the prophets and the law preached until John the
>Baptist only?
>If Jesus meant that the law is abolished in this
>scripture it means that we have a problem between this
>scripture and the scripture in Matthew 5: 17, because
>Jesus said in this scripture that no one could remove
>one jot of the laws. The Scripture reads: Think not
>that I come to destroy the law or the prophets I
>didn’t come to destroy it but to fulfill. FOR VERLY I
>SAY INTO YOU TILL HEAVEN AND EARTH PASS ONE JOT OR ONE
>TITLE SHALL IN NO WISE PASS FROM THE LAW, TILL ALL BE
>FULFILLED, Matthew 5: 17 to 18.
>
>I don’t see that heaven and earth pass yet, it means
>that we still under the law.
>
>If we presume that Jesus spoke to him, which I don’t
>believe that it happened, Paul lied in his second
>story. . Paul lied about his story when Jesus appeared
>to him, he told two different stories for the same
>event.
>The conclusion of Paul’s stories with the lord Jesus
>
>Paul’s first story in (Acts 9: 3 to 9) does not match
>with (Acts 26: 13 to 16).
>As Paul said in his first story: the lord did tell him
>only about (persecuting the lord Jesus. Then he said
>to him, ARISE AND GO INTO THE CITY, AND IT SHALL BE
>TOLD YOU WHAT YOU MUST DO).
>
>So the lord did not tell (Saul) Paul in this verse
>what he supposes to do as a minister, the Lord told
>him to go to the city for someone would tell him what
>he supposes to do.
>
>But Paul in his second story he said that the lord
>told him to preach the gospel AND TO TURN THEM FROM
>DARKNESS TO LIGHT, AND FROM THE POWER OF SATAN UNTO
>GOD. THAT THEY (MAY RECEIVE FORGIVENESS OF SINS), AND
>INHERITANCE AMONG THEM (WHICH ARE SANCTIFIED BY FAITH)
>THAT IS IN ME. Acts 26: 13 to 18}.
>
>Paul created this story to abolish God’s law, he said
>(by faith man is sanctified but not with his works).
>Also he claims that the faith (is in him). He said,
>WHICH IS SANCTIFIED BY FAITH THAT is in me.
>
>PETER WARNED US TO BE CAREFUL WHEN READING PAUL’S
>LETTERS.
>
>Some people interpret his letters as abolishing God’s
>law. Those letters are hard to understand, which led
>some people unto their own destructions.
>The scripture reads:{Bear in mind t
