Re: After sleeping on it -- Mamusz' Restoration Forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, [10] ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 18:36:47 03/04/11 Fri
Author: George
Subject: Re: After sleeping on it
In reply to: Lois 's message, "Re: After sleeping on it" on 14:00:33 03/04/11 Fri

>>>>>>After sleeping on it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I think it's time for me find a new Internet home
>>to
>>>>>>discuss theological beliefs. Life is short, I want
>>>to
>>>>>>focus on things that are meaningful to me in my
>>>>>>journey with Him.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Peace be with you, may you find the love of
>Christ!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Yours in Christ,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Wally
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>href="http://www.voy.com/2963/16829.html">http://ww
>w
>>.
>>>v
>>>>o
>>>>>y.com/2963/16829.html
>>>>>Wally,
>>>>>
>>>>>What do you think Jesus would say about questions
>of
>>>>>ordaining practicing homosexuals? What do you do
>>>Jesus
>>>>>would say about Encounter World Religions?
>>>>>
>>>>>Lois
>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>href="http://www.voy.com/2963/16833.html">http://ww
>w
>>.
>>>v
>>>>o
>>>>>y.com/2963/16833.html
>>>>>Lois,
>>>>>
>>>>>I think He would take a humble homosexual over
>>>someone
>>>>>without His charity. It's basphemy that Peter was
>>>>>addressed over the law in the 2nd chapter of
>>>>>Galatians. Jesus certainly shut the mouths of the
>>>>>people bent on stoning the women caught in
>>adultry!He
>>>>>certainly had a lot to say about Pharisees.
>>>>>
>>>>>Just saying
>>>>>
>>>>>Yours in Christ,
>>>>>
>>>>>Wally
>>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>href="http://www.voy.com/2963/16838.html">http://ww
>w
>>.
>>>v
>>>>o
>>>>>y.com/2963/16838.html
>>>>>Wally,
>>>>>
>>>>>Are you comparing circumcision to sodomy?
>>>>>
>>>>>I asked about "practicing homosexual" and you have
>>>>>tried to cloud the issue. I don't forget that you
>>all
>>>>>believe that they "were born that way". I on the
>>>other
>>>>>hand don't call someone a homosexual if they don't
>>>>>actually do that behavior. And a once practicing
>>>>>homosexual can repent, as Jesus told the woman
>>caught
>>>>>in adultery to do.
>>>>>
>>>>>But we all know that you are not talking about
>>>>>celibate homosexuals, since you want to marry them
>>to
>>>>>each other in the church also. So don't try to pull
>>>>>that one.
>>>>>
>>>>>So, I guess from your answer you do believe that
>God
>>>>>is calling practicing homosexuals to the
>priesthood.
>>>>>You who once portrayed yourself as a conservative
>>>have
>>>>>truly showed your face. You are with the program.
>>>>>
>>>>>Lois
>>>>
>>>>Lois, even the homosexuals themselves do not, deep
>>>>down inside, believe that they were "born that way."
>>A
>>>>prime example of this is the fact that Anne Rice's
>>>>book "Interview with a Vampire" was embraced
>>>>enthusiastically by the homosexual subculture, which
>>>>saw vampirism as a metaphor for homosexuality. In
>>>>fact, none of the male vampires ever selected female
>>>>companions, nor did the female vampires select male
>>>>ones. That looks homosexual on the surface, but lo
>>and
>>>>behold, the vampires in the story actively recruited
>>>>normal people to become vampires so that they would
>>>>have "life companions." So, to my way of thinking,
>>if
>>>>the homosexual subculture thinks that Anne Rice was
>>>>writing about homosexuality, they are welcome to
>>think
>>>>that, provided they acknowledge that Rice portrayed
>>>>vampires as being the exact opposite of "born that
>>>>way."
>>>>
>>>>Like Robbie the robot in "Forbidden Planet" refusing
>>>>to fire on the rampaging invisible creature because
>>he
>>>>actually knows, down in his circuits, that it is
>>>>really his own master, whom he has been programmed
>>not
>>>>to harm, the homosexuals immediately see in a
>fantasy
>>>>culture of outcasts who enlarge their numbers by
>>>>recruitment a stunning reflection of their own
>>>>lifestyles. Don't blame me for this interpretation.
>>>>Blame them. I don't control what homosexuals think.
>>>>
>>>>George
>>>
>>>George,
>>>
>>>Very interesting.
>>>
>>>Lois
>>
>>Anne Rice has become a crusader of sorts for the
>>homophiliacs. (A homophiliac is as different from a
>>homosexual as an Islamicist is from a Muslim.) If the
>>homosexual subculture believed that her supposed
>>depiction of them was inaccurate, they would be making
>>a hue and cry to have publishers run her out of town
>>for defaming them, with contradiction of their claim
>>that they are "born that way." There were probably
>>homosexuals in the CofC from day one. It was not until
>>the radical homophiliac movement began, and the CofC
>>unofficially adopted it, that homosexuality became a
>>problem in the church. Yet, as always, those who
>>object to radical homophilia are portrayed as hating
>>all homosexuals. Incidentally, that's what how the
>>radical Islamic terrorists are portraying those who go
>>after them: as being at war with all Muslims.
>>
>>Anne Rice made a big whoop-de-doo about "returning to
>>the Catholic Church," and wrote some abysmal books
>>based upon apocryphal gospels (which Roman Catholicism
>>rejects.) The last I heard of her was last year when
>>she announced on CNN that she was through with
>>Christianity because it didn't regard homosexuality
>>correctly. Her tirade reminded me of Sinead O'Connor
>>publicly tearing up a picture of the Pope. I thought
>>it strange that Rice's much publicized return from
>>apostasy was so ballyhooed, but so short.
>>
>>I'm not opposed to people reading Anne Rice's books,
>>though. Their popularity among the "gay community" is
>>the best expose of homosexual activism's
>>self-contradiction.
>>
>>George
>
>George,
>
>So, I have been checking it out.
>
> >href="http://www.queerty.com/anne-rice-ditches-christia
>nity-because-have-you-heard-its-so-anti-gay-20100729/">
>http://www.queerty.com/anne-rice-ditches-christianity-b
>ecause-have-you-heard-its-so-anti-gay-20100729/
>
>It seems that Ann Rice is a heroine to the homosexual
>community. I may have to read her book. I don't think
>they would like her if they didn't like her allegory
>of them.
>
>Lois
>

I agree, Lois. They would not like her if they did not like her allegory of their "lifestyle." So deep down inside, they subconsciously know what they will not admit to themselves. Remember what I said about speaking to the subconscious mind when we were posting hymns we had written. Anne Rice speaks to the subconscious mind of the homosexual, where he readily accepts the message as "true," even though his conscious mind is in disconnect, and denies it.

In fact, Anne Rice's first vampire book was a stand alone literary masterpiece. One of its chief theses was that the vampire is very self-indulgent, worldly, and materialistic. That is the root of his desire to live forever in this world. However, because this world changes, all the things he wanted to live to enjoy pass away, leaving him depressed and wanting to die. Which he wills to do and dies, despite his immortality, because his lifestyle is not what he thought it was when it was "sold" to him by another vampire.

The subsequent vampire books were an attempt to cash in financially on the popularity of the original novel. In order to do that, Rice had to deny the message of the original book and completely reverse it to give the vampires something to live for, so that they could romp through four or five more books and she could make money.

Mrs. Rice also wrote several hard core pornographic novels under pseudonyms. These books became big sellers after it was deliberately revealed that she was the author.

George

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Re: After sleeping on it -- George, 18:50:14 03/04/11 Fri

Re: After sleeping on it -- Lois, 19:22:10 03/04/11 Fri

Re: After sleeping on it -- George, 19:36:04 03/04/11 Fri
- Re: After sleeping on it -- Lois, 00:40:54 03/05/11 Sat
  - What's in a Name? (Was "After Sleeping On It") -- George, 09:16:20 03/05/11 Sat