Re: Further evidence, c-not-of-c has no credibility -- Mamusz' Restoration Forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, [2], 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 20:35:41 04/24/12 Tue
Author: George
Subject: Re: Further evidence, c-not-of-c has no credibility
In reply to: Lois 's message, "Re: Further evidence, c-not-of-c has no credibility" on 20:41:21 04/23/12 Mon

>> >>href="http://www.cofchrist.org/homepage/mar/presidency
>a
>>ddress.asp">http://www.cofchrist.org/homepage/mar/pres
>i
>>dencyaddress.asp
>>
>>Stephen M. Veazey says,
>>
>>�After consulting with my counselors, we decided the
>>president�s annual sharing should be on or near April
>>6 each year to celebrate the anniversary of the
>>church�s organization in 1830.
>>
>>The April date also is important in another way. On
>>April 6, 1860, Joseph Smith III accepted the call to
>>prophetic leadership of the �Reorganization� (RLDS
>>Church), now commonly known as Community of Christ.�
>>---------
>>
>>Notice that Steve Veazey does not include the fact
>>that Joseph Smith Jr. accepted leadership of the
>>restored church in 1830. Without the Restoration of
>>1830, and Joseph Smith Jr. as its leader and father of
>>Joseph Smith III, there would be no reorganization.
>>
>>Very much like in the novel, 1984, in which the
>>history books were constantly revisioned.
>>
>>The present leadership of the Community of Christ is a
>>collection of men and women who are absolutely no
>>different than the people who persecuted Joseph Smith
>>Jr. and the church in the 1800�s. Some of them just
>>happen to have ancestors who believed in the
>>Restoration and so they brag about how many
>>generations their families have been in the church.
>>With such a heritage they have no excuses for what
>>they have done.
>>
>>Lois
>
>Oh really?!?! I don't think so. Was the following
>ordination of an openly homosexual man made null and
>void? Or is this another case of, "well, it was only a
>few"? By the way, the bold is not by me, it is by
>Steve Veazey.
>
> >href="http://www.cofchrist.org/presidency/AprilAddress/
>041512/default.asp">http://www.cofchrist.org/presidency
>/AprilAddress/041512/default.asp
>
>Stephen M. Veazey
>
>"Second, we need to give serious attention to a
>reality in the church today. In some nations
>experienced pastors and church leaders are receiving
>priesthood calls through what they testify is the Holy
>Spirit�s witness for people in monogamous, committed,
>same-sex/gender relationships (legal marriages, civil
>unions, legal de facto relationships).
>
>The people being brought to the pastors� awareness are
>responsible, trusted, gifted, and compassionate
>disciples of Jesus Christ. Their lives evidence the
>presence of the Holy Spirit.
>
>Let me be clear, these calls are not being
>approved. This is in compliance with the 2002
>World Church Leadership Council statement that there
>would be no more exceptions in matters related to
>ordination unless policies were changed through the
>common consent of the people."
>
> >href="http://www.welcomingcommunitynetwork.org/wcnnews2
>00904.pdf">http://www.welcomingcommunitynetwork.org/wcn
>news200904.pdf
>
>page 1
>
>Keith Carter, a gay member of the Community of Christ
>- Walnut Creek, California congregation, reports that
>since it became a WCN congregation, there have been
>several ways it has shown support of the LGBT
>community.
>
> >href="http://www.sierrapacificmission.org/uploads/docum
>ents/SPMC_March_newsletter.pdf">http://www.sierrapacifi
>cmission.org/uploads/documents/SPMC_March_newsletter.pd
>f
>
>Volume 6, No. 2 April-May-June 2010
>SIERRA PACIFIC USA MISSION CENTER
>MISSION NEWS
>
>Page 5
>
>ORDINATIONS
>
>Walnut Creek congregation: March 21st - Judy Howe and
>Keith Carter to the office of Elder.
>--------------
>
>Can anyone believe anything coming from the
>c-not-of-c? I don't believe them.
>
>Lois
>
>2 Nephi 12
>
>97 There is nothing which is secret, save it shall be
>revealed; there is no work of darkness, save it shall
>be made manifest in the light; and there is nothing
>which is sealed upon the earth, save it shall be
>loosed.
>98 Wherefore, all things which have been revealed unto
>the children of men, shall at that day be revealed;
>99 And Satan shall have power over the hearts of the
>children of men no more, for a long time.

Ah, Lois, don't you know. These ordinations never happened, just as Joseph Smith's marriages to 43 different women never happened. The church has officially proclaimed a moratorium on ordaining homosexuals and on performing same-sex shacking up ceremonies. It's just John Taylor's England mission all over again.

It's so sad that the First Presidency and prieshood of the church are so embarrassed to be identified with the man whom they are most like: Joseph Smith, Jr.

George

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Re: Further evidence, c-not-of-c has no credibility -- Lois, 10:29:22 04/25/12 Wed
- Re: Further evidence, c-not-of-c has no credibility -- George, 21:28:25 04/26/12 Thu
  - Re: Further evidence, c-not-of-c has no credibility -- Lois, 01:50:22 04/27/12 Fri
    - Re: Further evidence, c-not-of-c has no credibility -- George, 19:06:02 04/27/12 Fri
- Re: Further evidence, c-not-of-c has no credibility -- john, 19:28:52 06/04/12 Mon