VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 12[3]45678910 ]


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 13:53:50 11/22/11 Tue
Author: Mamusz
Subject: Re: SALVATION IN NO OTHER
In reply to: George 's message, "Re: SALVATION IN NO OTHER " on 08:08:02 11/22/11 Tue

>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Neither is there salvation in any other: for
>there
>>>>is
>>>>>>>none other name under heaven given among men,
>>>>whereby
>>>>>>>we must be saved. Acts 4:12
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>And moreover, I say unto you, that there shall be
>>>no
>>>>>>>other name given, nor any other way nor means
>>>>whereby
>>>>>>>salvation can come unto the children of men, only
>>>in
>>>>>>>and through the name of Christ, the Lord
>>>>Omnipotent.
>>>>>>>Mosiah 1:116
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>There is no other name given, whereby salvation
>>>>>>>cometh, therefore, I would that ye should take
>>upon
>>>>>>>you the name of Christ, all you that have entered
>>>>>into
>>>>>>>the covenant with God, that ye should be obedient
>>>>>unto
>>>>>>>the end of your lives. Mosiah 3:11
>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>NO OTHER NAME PERIOD. NO OTHER NAME_NADA.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Mamusz
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>We all know that when we write in caps on the
>>>>>computer, it is "shouting." If Jesus Christ isn't
>>>>>something to shout about, I don't know what is.
>>>>>
>>>>>Mamusz
>>>>

>>>>
>>>>John, do you believe that Jesus Christ is the
>>ONLY
>>>>name whereby we can be saved?
>>>>
>>>>Mamusz
>>>>

>>>
>>>Mamusz, John said that he was going to shun us for a
>>>while. He said I was officially shunning him if I
>>>said I wouldn't read the next single one of his
>posts.
>>>He said he's taking off for a while, so if he doesn't
>>>read any of these posts, he's shunning us.
>>>
>>>I'm just using his parlance here.
>>>
>>>George
>>
>>Oh. We're being punished. ROTFL
>>
>>Lois
>
>John is depriving us of his "presence." I guess that,
>like Jimmy Osmond, we can sing "I'm gettin' nuttin'
>for Christmas."
>
>
>>
>>PAPER #5,The First Presidency (of
>>Community of Christ), January 9, 1979, 4:15 p.m.
>>
>>COPING WITH CONFLICTING MESSAGES
>>
>>It seems that it is difficult for persons who feel
>>compelled to express their divergent views to
>>discriminate between the lawful powers given to the
>>First Presidency for the sake of the church and the
>>privilege they have as individual members of the
>>church to express their point of view. There certainly
>>must be opportunity to express dissent and
>>dissatisfaction and this should be done directly with
>>the officer or officers involved. The First Presidency
>>are willing to give a hearing to responsible
>>criticism. Members do not have a right, however to
>>directly circularize the church with a point of view
>>or style which conflicts with the program emphasis
>>being presented to the church.
>
>
>Yeah, Lois. The current political administration was
>trying, and may have succeeded, in taking over the
>internet last week. Any websites offering "conflicting
>viewpoints" can (and probably will be) shut down. You
>can't run a dictatorship with free and open
>communication.
>
>I looked at the Facebook page of a "former
>denominational executive" of the Community of Christ a
>few days ago. One poster there posted that everybody
>ought to be free to have an opinion, unless it was
>hate speech, and then carefully laid the groundwork
>for shutting up everyone who disagreed with his
>beliefs." One of his beliefs, apparently, is that it
>is completely impossible for a homosexual to hate
>anybody. I suppose that homosexuals only kill or throw
>bricks through the windows of people they love.
>
>That's one of the reasons I resigned from the CofC.
>Since I am not a member, the First Presidency cannot
>cite their rules and laws to muzzle me.
>
>I find it amusing that the above pronouncement by the
>First Presidency pretty much says that any leader of
>the church can get up in the pulpit and say, or print
>in the church newsletter, any private heresy that he
>has, hoping that the general membership will mistake
>his private heresy for divine revelation to the
>church. However, anyone who takes issue with what he
>says is required to complain about it behind closed
>doors in a very limited audience. In other words,
>there is no effective rebuttal.
>
>George


George wrote:

"I suppose that homosexuals only kill or throw bricks through the windows of people they love."


Well, of course, George, you mean you didn't know that? ;-)

Mamusz


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


Replies:


Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]

Forum timezone: GMT-5
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.