Re: Thread Summary (Very Brief) -- Mamusz' Restoration Forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, [4], 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 10:31:59 08/27/11 Sat
Author: Lois
Subject: Re: Thread Summary (Very Brief)
In reply to: George 's message, "Thread Summary (Very Brief)" on 09:12:58 08/27/11 Sat

>George noted that some psychiatrists are saying that
>pedophilia is normal. Since secular medical opinion
>trumps the Bible in the CofC, George opined that
>pedophilia was next on the CofC approval list, citing
>previous approval of fornication, adultery, and
>homosexuality that has preceded along a track toward
>the previously unthinkable.
>
>John denied that there was a pattern of progression
>toward the unthinkable by falsely claiming that CofC
>does not perform shacking up ceremonies for unmarried
>and adulterous heterosexual couples as well as for
>homosexual ones. Matt has already admitted that the
>CofC does. So if the CofC does not perform shacking up
>ceremonies for heterosexuals, John has pretty much
>announced that a patriarch of the CofC is, for
>whatever reason, not telling the truth. So in the end,
>John fails to make any kind of point that the CofC
>hasn't already gotten a toboggan and headed down the
>slippery slope, (wheeeeee!) but suggests that
>information from the highest officials in the church
>is completely unreliable -- which is what Lois and I
>have been saying.
>
>Sean took a different approach to apologetic for the
>CofC's pursuit of Nicolaitanism by protesting that
>morality is relative. In other words, that depends
>upon the definition of what "is" is.
>
>The inability of our CofC participants to indicate
>that they consider anything "unthinkable" (other than
>traditional Christianity) is pretty upsetting.
>
>George

George,

And c-not-of-c pristkraft a keep comin' hare 'cause thay think we ain't got no book larnin' an we'll buy some o tha' snake ole that thar sellin'.

Lois

Lois

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Re: Thread Summary (Very Brief) -- George, 12:50:04 08/27/11 Sat