VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 123[4]5678910 ]


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 15:43:06 09/13/11 Tue
Author: George
Subject: Re: Nuclear weapons, good or bad?
In reply to: Lois 's message, "Nuclear weapons, good or bad?" on 11:17:22 09/13/11 Tue

>I believe that where I stand on nuclear weapons is the
>same place I stand on gun control. If either of them
>is outlawed only the bad guys will have them.
>
>Hmmm. And sometimes the supposedly good guys are
>really keeping secrets. You know, the kind of secrets
>that are kept "for the good of the public".
>
>If historians have written a true history then Hitler
>was desperately trying to develop nuclear weapons at
>the same time the US was. It was a race. What kind of
>world would we have if Hitler had gotten them first?
>
>Here is what I also believe, church members of any
>denomination should be taught the gospel. They should
>also learn history and keep abreast of current events.
>Then they should weigh issues and vote their
>conscious. I don't like it when a church denomination
>dictates how its members should vote on any issue.
>
>Lois

Lois, we only won WWII because of divine intervention. At that time, Western civilization was definitely worth preserving. He may not feel that way any more.

Hitler already had working jet fighter planes. If he had only delayed starting the war by a year or two, the Allied forces would not have been able to bomb German industrial plants. Nazi jets would have swept their prop planes from the skies. No piston-engine fighter plane would have been able to protect bomber squadrons from those planes. At that time, the delay in American mobilization caused by the village idiots was negligible. Now that the village idiots are presidents of our universities and Christian denominations, that would no longer be true.

The most recent WWII history cranked out by the NEA funding in the hands of liberals was an indictment of the airplane as an invention used to slaughter people. However, the museum exhibits went out of their way to extol Japanese kamikazi pilots as "heroes."

How have we allowed truth to be twisted and perverted by these persons and organizations who apparently were born hating us and our country. No wonder they don't like the Book of Mormon. It calls America "blessed." But unfortunately, these are not the leaders of an enemy country. These are the teachers, clergymen, educators, and journalists in our own country.

How much longer will it be before they introduce us to what C.S. Lewis described in The Screwtape Letters as "Our Father Below"?

George

Cultural Marxists understand this. Their Critical Theory was a prototype of the politics of personal destruction. What the latter does to popular leaders, Critical Theory does to an entire nation through repeated assaults on its past. It is the moral equivalent of vandalizing the graves and desecrating the corpses of its ancestors.

Many of the institutions that now have custody of America's past operate on the principles of
Big Brothr's Ministry of Truth:" Drop down the "memory hole" the patriotic stories of America's greatness and glory, and produce new "warts-and-all" histories that play up her crimes and sins, revewaling what we have loved to be loathsome and those we have revered to be disreputable, even despicable. .... Ultimate goal: Destroy patriotism, kill the love of country, demoralize the peole, deconstruct America. History then will no longer unite and inspire us, but depress and divide us into the children of victims and the children of the villains of America's past.


Patrick Buchanan

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


Replies:

  • Re: Nuclear weapons, good or bad? -- john, 16:36:55 09/13/11 Tue
  • Re: Nuclear weapons, good or bad? -- George, 19:48:31 09/13/11 Tue
    Post a message:
    This forum requires an account to post.
    [ Create Account ]
    [ Login ]

    Forum timezone: GMT-5
    VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
    Before posting please read our privacy policy.
    VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
    Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.