Re: Nuclear weapons, good or bad? -- Mamusz' Restoration Forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, [4], 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 16:36:55 09/13/11 Tue
Author: john
Subject: Re: Nuclear weapons, good or bad?
In reply to: Lois 's message, "Nuclear weapons, good or bad?" on 11:17:22 09/13/11 Tue

i don't think that having nuclear weapons is bad in the same way that i think that having guns is not bad. it is the use of the weapon that makes it bad.

john

>I believe that where I stand on nuclear weapons is the
>same place I stand on gun control. If either of them
>is outlawed only the bad guys will have them.
>
>Hmmm. And sometimes the supposedly good guys are
>really keeping secrets. You know, the kind of secrets
>that are kept "for the good of the public".
>
>If historians have written a true history then Hitler
>was desperately trying to develop nuclear weapons at
>the same time the US was. It was a race. What kind of
>world would we have if Hitler had gotten them first?
>
>Here is what I also believe, church members of any
>denomination should be taught the gospel. They should
>also learn history and keep abreast of current events.
>Then they should weigh issues and vote their
>conscious. I don't like it when a church denomination
>dictates how its members should vote on any issue.
>
>Lois

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Re: Nuclear weapons, good or bad? -- George, 19:48:31 09/13/11 Tue
- Re: Nuclear weapons, good or bad? -- john, 07:51:28 09/14/11 Wed
  - Re: Nuclear weapons, good or bad? -- George, 19:06:26 09/14/11 Wed
    - Re: Nuclear weapons, good or bad? -- john, 18:02:44 09/15/11 Thu
      - Why CofC's leftwing antinuclear protests are a joke and an insult -- George, 17:18:42 09/17/11 Sat
        Re: Why CofC's leftwing antinuclear protests are a joke and an insult -- john, 08:29:07 09/18/11 Sun
        Re: Why CofC's leftwing antinuclear protests are a joke and an insult -- George, 12:17:07 09/18/11 Sun
        Re: Why CofC's leftwing antinuclear protests are a joke and an insult -- john, 07:48:32 09/19/11 Mon
        Re: Why CofC's leftwing antinuclear protests are a joke and an insult -- George, 20:21:33 09/19/11 Mon
        Re: Why CofC's leftwing antinuclear protests are a joke and an insult -- john, 20:25:35 09/19/11 Mon
        Re: Why CofC's leftwing antinuclear protests are a joke and an insult -- George, 16:23:25 09/24/11 Sat
        Re: Why CofC's leftwing antinuclear protests are a joke and an insult -- john, 07:52:33 09/25/11 Sun
        Re: Why CofC's leftwing antinuclear protests are a joke and an insult -- George, 08:56:23 09/25/11 Sun
        Pourquoi le CofC's "Leftwing" protestations antinucl�aires sont une plaisanterie et un affront -- George, 18:50:14 09/25/11 Sun
        Por qu� los protestas antiatomicas del CofC son una broma y un insulto -- George, 19:00:43 09/25/11 Sun