Re: Lies about the NCC and WCC -- Mamusz' Restoration Forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, [4], 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 08:41:15 09/18/11 Sun
Author: john
Subject: Re: Lies about the NCC and WCC
In reply to: George 's message, "Lies about the NCC and WCC" on 22:34:48 09/17/11 Sat

oh, please do post it George!

richard price was silenced for many things... not merely saying that the church was going to join in the ncc...

now, can someone explain to me, while not blaming the communists, why ncc membership is a bad thing? no one has been able to tell me why it is a good thing either.

john

>The reason I have made such a big deal about the
>RLDS/Community of Christ officially joining the NCC is
>this:
>
>One of the reasons that O.C. Henson told Richard Price
>that the latter was facing silencing was because
>Richard Price had printed things about the church that
>were not true.
>
>He berated Price for not writing all the authors of
>church articles and asking them what they had meant
>when they wrote the things Price was disturbed about.
>
>(Of course, John has already let on that anybody who
>asks a question that the leadership finds unpalatable
>will not get an answer.)
>
>To top it all off, Henson identified one of the lies
>that Price had allegedly published was the the First
>Presidency intended to take the church into the
>National Council of Churches. Henson said that this
>was patently untrue, and quoted an "official"
>statement in the Herald that this was not true.
>
>And lo, and behold, just as Price predicted, the
>leadership finally managed to get the papers signed
>making the CofC's membership in the NCC official.
>
>Is the hierarchy going to censure O.C. Henson for
>telling a falsehood? Will it silence or otherwise
>punish the authors of the statement in the Herald that
>turns out NOT to have been true? Will the hierarchy
>reverse Price's silencing, on the grounds that the
>charges against him were false? After all, Price was
>silenced for printing that the leaders wanted to join
>the NCC. And despite the denials that were as thick as
>flies on a cow patty, they certainly did intend to do
>so.
>
>These guys could lie circles around Richard Nixon,
>Bill Clinton, Joseph Stalin, and Enedict Arnold. But
>they make a great pretense of taking offense at
>alleged lies that turn out to be solidly true.
>
>BTW, Lois, I still have a copy of the transcript of
>Richard Price's "counseling" session just before his
>silencing. If you don't still have a copy of it from
>my posting it back in 2004, I'll post it here again.
>
>George

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Re: Lies about the NCC and WCC -- George, 11:52:52 09/18/11 Sun