Las mentiras del Consejo Nacional de Iglesias y del Consejo Mudial de Iglesias -- Mamusz' Restoration Forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, [4], 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 19:18:30 09/25/11 Sun
Author: George
Subject: Las mentiras del Consejo Nacional de Iglesias y del Consejo Mudial de Iglesias
In reply to: George 's message, "Lies about the NCC and WCC" on 22:34:48 09/17/11 Sat

La raz�n Yo he hecho tal negocio grande sobre el RLDS/la Comunidad de Cristo oficialmente uniendo el NCC es esto:

Una de las razones ese O.C. Henson cont� Richard de Precio que el posterior encaraba silenciando era porque Richard de Precio hab�a imprimido cosas sobre la iglesia que no eran verdades.

El rega�� Precio para no escribiendo todos los autores de
los art�culos de iglesia y pedir que ellos qu� ellos hayan significado cuando ellos escribieron las cosas Price se perturb� sobre.

(por supuesto, John ha dejar ya sobre que alguien quien
hace una pregunta que el liderazgo encuentra malos en sabor no conseguir� una respuesta.)

Para superar lo todos fuera, Henson identific� una de las mentiras que el Precio hab�a publicado supuestamente era el el Primero La Presidencia destinada para tomar la iglesia en el El Consejo Nacional de Iglesias. Henson dijo que esto
era completamente inexacto, y cotizado un empleado la declaraci�n en el Heraldo que este no era cierto.

Y percibir, as� como el Precio predeci�, el liderazgo finalmente administrado para conseguir los papeles firm�
la elaboraci�n de los CofC's miembros en el NCC de funcionario.

�Es la jerarqu�a que va para censurar O.C. Henson para
contar una falsedad? �Silencia o de otra manera castigue los autores de la declaraci�n en el Heraldo que
resulta ser NO para tener sido cierto? �La jerarqu�a
el rev�s Precio silenciando, sobre los terrenos que el
las cargas contra �l eran falsas? Despu�s que todos, el Precio era silenciado para imprimir que los l�deres quiso unir el NCC. Y a pesar de las negativas que eran tan gruesas como la mosca sobre una pila de esti�rcol, ellos seguramente destinaron hacer tan.

Estos tipos podr�an yacer c�rculos alrededor Richard Nixon,
Bill Clinton, Joseph Stalin, y Benedict Arnold. Pero
ellos hacen una grande vanidad de tomar delito a
las mentiras alegadas que resultan ser s�lidamente ciertas.

BTW, Lois, Yo todav�a tengo una copia de la copia de
Richard Precio "aconsejando" jornada simplemente antes de su silenciando. Si usted no todav�a tiene una copia de lo desde mi contabilizar respalda en 2004, Yo pegar� lo aqu� nuevamente.

George

>The reason I have made such a big deal about the
>RLDS/Community of Christ officially joining the NCC is
>this:
>
>One of the reasons that O.C. Henson told Richard Price
>that the latter was facing silencing was because
>Richard Price had printed things about the church that
>were not true.
>
>He berated Price for not writing all the authors of
>church articles and asking them what they had meant
>when they wrote the things Price was disturbed about.
>
>(Of course, John has already let on that anybody who
>asks a question that the leadership finds unpalatable
>will not get an answer.)
>
>To top it all off, Henson identified one of the lies
>that Price had allegedly published was the the First
>Presidency intended to take the church into the
>National Council of Churches. Henson said that this
>was patently untrue, and quoted an "official"
>statement in the Herald that this was not true.
>
>And lo, and behold, just as Price predicted, the
>leadership finally managed to get the papers signed
>making the CofC's membership in the NCC official.
>
>Is the hierarchy going to censure O.C. Henson for
>telling a falsehood? Will it silence or otherwise
>punish the authors of the statement in the Herald that
>turns out NOT to have been true? Will the hierarchy
>reverse Price's silencing, on the grounds that the
>charges against him were false? After all, Price was
>silenced for printing that the leaders wanted to join
>the NCC. And despite the denials that were as thick as
>flies on a cow patty, they certainly did intend to do
>so.
>
>These guys could lie circles around Richard Nixon,
>Bill Clinton, Joseph Stalin, and Enedict Arnold. But
>they make a great pretense of taking offense at
>alleged lies that turn out to be solidly true.
>
>BTW, Lois, I still have a copy of the transcript of
>Richard Price's "counseling" session just before his
>silencing. If you don't still have a copy of it from
>my posting it back in 2004, I'll post it here again.
>
>George

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]