Re: Who Doesn't Get the Point? -- Mamusz' Restoration Forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, [4], 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 14:52:35 10/23/11 Sun
Author: john
Subject: Re: Who Doesn't Get the Point?
In reply to: George 's message, "Re: Who Doesn't Get the Point?" on 20:11:21 10/21/11 Fri

once again george... this post of yours is nonsense.

john

>Lois wrote:
>/////////////////////Begin quote////////////////
>
>>>Calls to the priesthood are supposed to come by the
>>>leading of the Holy Spirit. "Accidently and
>>>unknowingly" ordaining unrepentant homosexuals tells
>>>us that these calls come from man, not through the
>>>Holy Spirit. The Holy Spirit calls men to be
>spiritual
>>>leaders, not wolves.
>>>
>>>Lois
>\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\End
>quote\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
>
>John responded:
>
>
>/////////////////////////Begin
>quote//////////////////////
>>the calls do come from the holy spirit with the
>>testimony of others who have sensed those calls...
>\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\End
>quote\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
>
>John, it has already been established that the
>leadership of the CofC is nothing but a bunch of liars
>-- from their denials of intent to join the NCC to
>their denials that they intended to ordain women, all
>the way to their denials that they ordain homosexuals.
>So who are the spiritual persons "sensing" these
>alleged calls? My guess is that one street corner
>psychic is as good as another.
>
>/////////////////////Begin quote\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
>>as for wolves, your "fleece" slipped long ago...
>>
>>john
>\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\End
>quote\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
>
>So sad for you, John. When Jesus spoke of "wolves
>in sheep's clothing," he was speaking of duly
>authorized leaders of the faith, wielding authority,
>who were "wolves in sheep's clothing." A marxist, or a
>gay liberationist, or any other kind of psychotic
>activist using the clerical collar to push his
>unChristian agenda is a modern day version of what
>Jesus (and Lois) was talking about.
>
>To apply the phrase to someone who does not claim any
>spiritual authority is way, way too obtuse to make any
>sense.
>
>But, I guess that, considering the title of the
>thread, your firsthand illustration of someone not
>getting the point is apt.
>
>I guess if Lois were, for some reason, to point out
>some of the more glaring problems with the current
>America president, you'd accuse her of being
>the traitor in the White House. As Lois said, the Lord
>calls men to leadership positions, and as such,
>it really is more than impossible for you to twist the
>figure of speech to apply to her. That figure of
>speech is just one of many, many things that Jesus
>said that the Community of Christ priesthood
>absolutely and obviously does not understand at
>all, (whether out of stupidity, or willful refusal to
>understand;) hence the lack of fluency here.
>
>George
>
>"If George Washington were alive today, he'd turn over
>in his grave."
>Ring Lardner

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Re: Who Doesn't Get the Point? -- George, 15:32:22 10/23/11 Sun