VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 123[4]5678910 ]


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 07:11:24 10/28/11 Fri
Author: john
Subject: Re: Price silencing... good, bad, indifferent?
In reply to: George 's message, "Re: Price silencing... good, bad, indifferent?" on 23:09:40 10/27/11 Thu


i have told you many times, george, that i am just "small potatos" in the church...

john



>>to let you know that you are quite mistaken in your
>>opinion and let you know there is still room for you
>>in the community of christ. even if you have
>>requested that your name be removed from the
>records...
>>
>>john
>
>John, the real reason is that your doubt has become so
>great that you are forced to find some safe "heathens"
>to preach to so that you can keep yourself convinced.
>
>If I didn't believe a counselor in the First
>Presidency tell me that I was welcome back any time I
>wanted, why would I believe the equivalent of a lay
>preacher? If I can't trust the man in the organization
>who is a heartbeat away from the Presidency, and two
>heartbeats away from God himself, how could I trust
>you, his 115th level underling?
>
>In defense of Mr. Robinson's mental faculties, I have
>to include the fact that he wrote me this around June
>1, 2001. I seriously doubt that after the little
>retreat of the FP that August, following which it
>announced that it wouldn't repent and undo what it had
>done, that Mr. Robinson would have been foolish enough
>to suppose that he had any credibility after that
>point.
>
>After all, there is a reason why he was in the
>First Presidency, and you weren't; and there is a
>reason why you are here, and he isn't.
>
>George

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


Replies:


Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]

Forum timezone: GMT-5
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.