VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 123[4]5678910 ]


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 08:26:35 10/28/11 Fri
Author: George
Subject: Re: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly
In reply to: john 's message, "Re: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly" on 07:15:16 10/28/11 Fri

>ROFLOL!
>
>i am not in any of your stated stages, george, and i
>strongly disagree with your conclusions...
>
>though i would agree that you are in anger...
>
>i am wondering with you, as with many who left, if
>there were not issues and problems long before this
>one...
>john

"You were wondering with me?" John, when have we ever done anything together?

Well, John, since the Communitarian Church is into delusional genetics, I guess that you can convince yourself that, just as God "made homosexuals that way," that God made those you disagree with bitter and mean.

But John, you may be on to something. The five thousand members who left the church in the 1920's, under the iron fist of F.M. Smith, were just another sign that all was not well in Zion. And when R.C. Evans, a member of the First Presidency itself, turned against the church, that was another sign that something isn't right. This problem goes all the way back to Nauvoo and beyond.

That's why I left the church. After the ten year (at the time) secret mission of the leadership to set up sacramental sodomy in the church, I realized that throughout the history of the church, there has been a marked tendency of the First Presidency to treat the membership as if the FP were an unethical lawyer with power of attorney over an Alzheimer victim's estate. And guess whom is being treated like the Alzheimer's victim?

The problem with the Communitarian Church is its leadership structure. And finding out that the leadership structure was penciled into the revelations after they had been issued and printed, makes one understand that there is no way to reform the church. The leadership has been out of control since 1835. And, of course, jettisoning both Joseph Smith, Jr. and Brigham Young by claiming the church began in 1860 doesn't eliminate F.M. Smith, Wallace B. Smith, W. Grant McMurray, or Steve Veazey from the rogues gallery.

I repeat, John, the product that the church is selling is adulterated and bogus because the leadership has decided that it is more profitable for them to make it that way. And claiming that it won't sell because of the prejudice of the general public against adultery, sodomy, deceit, and self aggrandizing priests, is a very bad excuse for failure.

George

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


Replies:


Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]

Forum timezone: GMT-5
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.