Re: The Q revealed -- Mamusz' Restoration Forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, [5], 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 12:42:38 08/28/11 Sun
Author: Lois
Subject: Re: The Q revealed
In reply to: George 's message, "The Q revealed" on 11:52:25 08/28/11 Sun

>The "Q" sex appears to be a much more insidious
>classification than I thought.
>
>"Q" has been added to the list of sexes as: a person
>who is wondering what sex he is, because he doesn't
>know which of the other six to call him/herself.
>
>Now how do you supposed people got confused about
>these things in the first place?
>
>The worst of it is that most persons falling in the
>"Q" classification are probably underage. This gives
>leverage to homosexual activist groups to try to
>access underage children on the grounds of "helping"
>them. Who "helped" confuse them in the first place?
>
>Theoretically, there should be two Q's. A biologically
>female Q who doesn't know what sex he/she is, and a
>biologically male Q who doesn't know what sex he/she
>is. But, given the fact that sex is now classified,
>not by biology, but spiritually, according to what the
>person thinks he is. If the person doesn't know
>what to think, then neither he nor anybody else knows
>what sex he/she is.
>
>Imagine if your personal identity were completely
>based upon who you think you are, independent of
>fingerprints or any birth records. A person who had
>Alzheimer's would cease to have any identity at all,
>because, having forgot who he thought he was, no one
>else could "force" an identity upon him using physical
>clues.
>
>I truly wish that someone in a position of authority
>had actually sat down and thought about where all this
>is leading. Apparently they gave it no more thought
>than in deciding what to have for dinner. And their
>lack of concern has put the children on the plate.
>
>If all this sounds stupid, it is. And this is the
>stupidity that our leaders in and out of the church
>have bought into. Of course, a leader who thinks that
>she can spend borrowed money to get out of debt is
>just about stupid enough to promote this Planet of the
>Seven Sexes nonsense. But, of course, they don't call
>it that, because deep inside, they know that it is
>stupid, and they don't want to trigger recognition of
>that stupidity by using language that would make it
>obvious.
>
>When a drug addict has to take a precription narcotic
>in front of a child, or a friend whom she supposes is
>completely ignorant of such matters, she tells the
>child that she has to take a "vitamin." Do you think
>that the people addicted to this Planet of the Seven
>Sexes stupidity are going to come out and tell anybody
>what this actually is?
>
>Would you allow a prescription drug addict to run a
>pharmacy?
>
>Would you appoint an illegal alien to be head of
>immigration and naturalization?
>
>Would you appoint someone who is very, very heavily in
>debt to loan sharks as president of a bank?
>
>Would you let anybody enmired in sexual confusion
>counsel anybody about sexuality?
>
>George

There was a couple in Toronto, Canada who were hiding the gender of their young baby in order to let him/her choose its own gender identity.

I don't know exactly when it happened, but there began to be preached "you can be whatever you want to be". I believe that there are "many" things a person can be, but I don't believe they can be "anything" they want to be.

A 5'6" person is probably not going to be able to be a professional basketball player. A 200 lb. girl is probably not going to be a gymnast. A person with a developmental handicap is not going to be able to become president. A man is not going to be able to be a mother.

When did parents give their children such a feeling of entitlement that they could do whatever they pleased and be ordained into Jesus Christ's priesthood and also become a paid church employee, etc.?

Once upon a time people could see the boundaries of their capabilities. Maybe they could stretch society's falsely perceived boundaries. But nature's laws and God's moral laws cannot be done away.

Lois

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Re: The Q revealed -- George, 17:20:56 08/28/11 Sun
- Re: The Q revealed -- George, 07:43:10 09/08/11 Thu