Re: John, Have You Anything to Say about the 40 years of "no NCC" lies -- Mamusz' Restoration Forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, [5], 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 07:38:11 09/21/11 Wed
Author: john
Subject: Re: John, Have You Anything to Say about the 40 years of "no NCC" lies
In reply to: George 's message, "Re: John, Have You Anything to Say about the 40 years of "no NCC" lies" on 23:30:28 09/20/11 Tue

from what i read i don't know that "lie" is the word i would have used. price was writing things that were deliberately antagonistic to the church and was unrepentant. he also did not follow the policy when it comes to writing things and was unrepentant... there, in that, is enough grounds for silencing.

john

>I forgot to tell you, John:
>
>Don't go away until you have had enough time to
>identify something Price printed or said to the church
>that actually was a lie. A Stake President couldn't
>even do it, but I'm confident that someone such as
>yourself could identify these alleged falsehoods. You
>know, two of the other lies that Price was accused of
>printing was that the liberalists intended to ordain
>women, and that they intended to ordain homosexuals.
>But we know that in those cases as well, Price was
>proven truthful, and the First Presdency proven to be
>liars.
>
>For a church that is always decrying "rumors," that is
>pretty sad, actually.
>
>But you have to hang around and keep posting, even if
>it's nothing but "LOL," so that you can get the
>transcript to scroll into the archives, where it will
>be less accessible, right?
>
>George

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Re: John, Have You Anything to Say about the 40 years of "no NCC" lies -- john, 07:40:25 09/21/11 Wed
- Re: John, Have You Anything to Say about the 40 years of "no NCC" lies -- George, 08:49:31 09/21/11 Wed
Re: John, Have You Anything to Say about the 40 years of "no NCC" lies -- George, 08:43:32 09/21/11 Wed