Re: John, Have You Anything to Say about the 40 years of "no NCC" lies -- Mamusz' Restoration Forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, [5], 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 08:43:32 09/21/11 Wed
Author: George
Subject: Re: John, Have You Anything to Say about the 40 years of "no NCC" lies
In reply to: john 's message, "Re: John, Have You Anything to Say about the 40 years of "no NCC" lies" on 07:38:11 09/21/11 Wed

>from what i read i don't know that "lie" is the word i
>would have used. price was writing things that were
>deliberately antagonistic to the church and was
>unrepentant. he also did not follow the policy when
>it comes to writing things and was unrepentant...
>there, in that, is enough grounds for silencing.
>
>john
>

John, that doesn't answer the charge that O.C. Henson made that Price was publishing many things that were not true. He couldn't cite anything except what has turned out to be true.

Liars and crooks find the truth to be antagonistic and inimical to their activities. That is why Price was silenced and ultimately excommunicated.

Now if you want to argue that the church is a criminal gang, and that the gang has a right to throw anybody out who might turn States Evidence (or Queen's Evidence,) then yours would be a perfectly logical explanation that I could not possibly argue against. If I were trying to blow open a bank vault, while I was prepping the charges, I simply could not tolerate having Moses around telling me that I shouldn't steal. That sort of thing slows one down, and is very demoralizing.

George

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]