Re: c-not-of-c leadership and the homosexual agenda cont. -- Mamusz' Restoration Forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, [6], 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 23:33:35 07/04/11 Mon
Author: George
Subject: Re: c-not-of-c leadership and the homosexual agenda cont.
In reply to: Lois 's message, "Re: c-not-of-c leadership and the homosexual agenda cont." on 11:33:49 07/04/11 Mon

>Suzanne Trewhitt McLaughlin is the wife of Ken
>McLaughlin, who is already in these threads as a
>proponent of the homosexual agenda. So is she. She has
>publically endorsed the homosexual agenda. She is on
>the teaching staff of the c-not-of-c seminary. What
>position do you suppose she teaches to perspective
>servants of the church?
>---------

I read you loud and clear, Lois.

What would have happened at the constitutional convention during the 1780's, if only monarchists had been allowed to attend and participate?

An avowed homophiliac (and one need not be homosexual to be such) teaching in a seminary is never, never going to teach any Bible interpretation that crosses her own personal opinion. Having such an apostate teaching in the seminary (and probably sought after for the position by the CofC leadership) is hoisting the ensign of apostasy over the Community of Christ -- better known by the less bigoted and more informal term "Communitarian Church."

In a church in which anyone who is not prohomosexual, antiBible, antiChristian, and pro "cheap grace" is screened out of any leadership position track, there cannot be any roundtable discussion of different options. In the minds of the participants, the conclusion has already been reached. After all, no one who had not already reached that conclusion was allowed to come to the discussion. I hear the constant din of "inclusiveness." However, in order to achieve their agenda, the first order of the day was to "include out" any conservative member of the priesthood, and to "include out" from voting any member on the rolls who had the slightest conservative leanings. That's what happened when Uncle Dolph burned the Reichstag. At the new meeting location, screeners made sure no nonNazi members of the governing body were allowed inside. This is a politician's dream. Politicans do not dream of common consent, nor of democracy. They dream of monarchy, dictatorship, and/or theocracy. The former Communitarian prophet who described himself in his post-priesthood profile as a "former denominational executive" was simply exposing himself as a career ecclesiastical politician -- not a man of God.

There is no discussion going on in these meetings about WHAT is going to be done. The only discussion is about how to pull off what has already been written in stone.

Don't worry too much about the brainwashing of children in the Houston area, though. One of the last Sunday services I attended (in 2002) had a discussion of how enough juveniles (in a major metropolitan area could be congregated into one location so that some kind of Sunday School could actually be held. Otherwise, the numerous starveling branches scattered round about the city during the first round of liberalization in the 1960's, would have one child in each grade level class -- if they were lucky. If there are any liberals in Houston still associated with the Communitarian Church, they are having to brainwash their own children for lack of any others.

BTW, I saw a post on the internet from a woman who stated that the job situation in Texas is better than most other places in the country. That is because Texas has conservative values, such as a right to work law, etc. In the heavily liberalized areas such job prospects are much worse. Prospects for religious worship and practice of historical Christianity -- the saving gospel kind -- are much worse in the liberalized areas, too, since liberals see religion as another way to manipulate people into submitting to their political will.

The specter of the "One True and Living Church" joining the apostate NCC was exactly like the last scene in "Animal Farm." You know, when the pigs who had started the revolution on the basis that animals needed to be free from all human control signed an agreement with the humans. The priesthood that assembled a church by saying that it's call to existence was on account of no other churches being any good to God finally decided that being apostates pays off better in political power, and perhaps cash.

George

BTW, how does one become a "former prophet?" When one is filled with the Holy Spirit, is it possible to have a slow leak, or something more spectacular like a blowout?

Imagine Jesus' resume reading "Former divinity, former messiah."

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]