VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 12345678[9]10 ]


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 17:17:37 03/30/11 Wed
Author: john
Subject: Re: Why the Community of Christ no longer wants to be known as RLDS (the original 1830 church)
In reply to: George 's message, "Re: Why the Community of Christ no longer wants to be known as RLDS (the original 1830 church)" on 08:23:36 03/30/11 Wed

i am not a "brainwasher"... really lois... your claims get wilder and wilder! i am small potatos in the church...

now, which evangelists are "adulterers" or is this something else you have concocted from nothing?

john


>>>>>then you don't know me very well george. jsii was
>>>>>married and the statement i made about the affair
>>was
>>>>>a quote from history... i don't mince words with
>>>>>folks married who fool around.
>>>>>
>>>>>john
>>>>
>>>>Yeah right. Are you going to try to convince us that
>>>>the bisexual members coming out so proudly are
>>>>celibate?
>>>>
>>>>Lois
>>>
>>>Lois, the church turns a blind eye to the fact that
>>>married men who "come out" at age 45 usually started
>>>fooling around behind their wives backs in order to
>>>"discover" they were homosexuals. These men who
>>>suddenly leave their wives for other men are not
>>>speculative homosexuals. They have been practicing.
>>>And practicing automatically means adultery.
>>>
>>>A woman is not "born" knowing that sex with a woman
>is
>>>"better" than sex with a man. She has to try it to
>>>"discover" this. And in order to do that, she either
>>>has to have premarital sex (with another woman) or
>>>extramarital sex (with another woman.) There is no
>way
>>>that any of this can be right.
>>>
>>>Adulterers never say, "Gee, I'm tired of our marriage
>>>and I want out, because I would like to go and look
>>>for someone else to love." When the subject is first
>>>broached with the spouse, there is already a "someone
>>>else" all lined up and already broken in.
>>>
>>>That's the trouble with homosexuality. For some
>>>reason, very few people "know" that they are "born"
>>>that way until they become rather old. Imagine a
>black
>>>man living in modern society who didn't "know" that
>he
>>>was born black until he figured it out at age 41!
>>>
>>>George
>>
>>George,
>>
>>When c-not-of-c evangelists get up and proudly
>>proclaim themselves to be adulterers john will
>>suddenly not be so self-righteous. I believe john is
>>one of the brain washers, not a brain washee.
>>
>>Lois
>
>Lois, that will not happen for some time. It has taken
>from 1992 to now to get to the point where the
>homophiliacs have taken over the church. Assuming that
>they take pity on the adulterers, and decide to share
>power with them, It will take another while to
>gradually brainwash the church members who stay into
>accepting adultery.
>
>George

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


Replies:


Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]

Forum timezone: GMT-5
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.