Name (required):

  Expression ^{(Optional mood/title along with your name) Examples: (happy, sad, The Joyful, etc.) help)}

  E-mail address (optional):

* Type your message here:
>I've nothing against Croft as such. Sure he's had >some good performances - I was there for some of his >best, including the match in Christchurch, the one >before it in Wellington where he turned in an >excellent performance, and the draw against the >Springboks in Manchester. > >But on balance, he's an average performer at best, and >we would better served blooding promising youngsters >whilst the team is doing well. Croft offers nothing >that we don't already know about, and his performance >against West Indies this summer was a shocker. > >I'm staggered that anyone can say Schofield isn't good >enough - how do we know? Two test matches, one on a >damp wicket where he didn't even get a bowl, and 17 >overs in the next. Sure, he didn't bowl well, but >everyone's allowed nerves aren't they? Shane Warne >took 1-100+ in his first match. Schofield also scored >a 50 as well. > >What's the point of contracts if you're not going to >pick the players they were awarded to? Schofield was >good enough in April 2000 - what's changed since then?

Note: This forum is moderated -- new posts are not visible until approved.

Notice: Copies of your message may remain on this and other systems on internet. Please be respectful.