VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1[2] ]
Subject: Hume's Fork


Author:
mi chamocha
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 03:53:21 07/11/01 Wed
In reply to: lark33i 's message, "explaining our lack of free will" on 07:12:38 06/07/01 Thu

I don't like Hume's Fork. I wrote a response to it in my diary a while back (although I don't necessarily believe the argument I gave then anymore). But the argument still shows why Hume's Fork make free will impossible.

And I don't really buy into that Plinko Board analogy for G-d anymore (after all, the Plinko Board would be contingent ;-)

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:
Subject Author Date
reality simulation (as Flannel was saying...)omnifinite20:20:06 07/20/01 Fri
    problem with this claim: quantum mechanicsmi chamocha10:41:22 07/22/01 Sun


    [ Contact Forum Admin ]


    Forum timezone: GMT-10
    VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
    Before posting please read our privacy policy.
    VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
    Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.