Response. --

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, [2] ]

Subject: Response.

Author:
Flannel

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 14:55:10 07/11/01 Wed
In reply to: mi chamocha 's message, "response" on 12:20:14 07/11/01 Wed

I take it, then (as I'm not a mathemetician) that you are referring to the number 1 and the number 0, then. Now, if I remember my days in Cal 3 sophomore year, I recall that 0 is not infinity--therefore, my statement has nothing to do with it. Past that, the number 1 may be a subset of infinity, but even then, you're taking an account of something with parts. No number exists without its sum (I think that's the phrasing, but I'll double check my book, later)... certainly Algebra agrees with that. 2 is 1 + 1, and 1 has parts (an infinite number of them, of course).
Now, if you didn't mean (0,1) as an interval, nor each number by themselves... what do you mean by {1,0}?

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Subject	Author	Date
Set Theory	mi chamocha	17:47:35 07/11/01 Wed

Sorry...my bad	mi chamocha	17:48:45 07/11/01 Wed

Sets	An Atheist	21:28:30 07/11/01 Wed