VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1[2] ]
Subject: Sets


Author:
An Atheist
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 21:28:30 07/11/01 Wed
In reply to: Flannel 's message, "Response." on 14:55:10 07/11/01 Wed

"the number 1 may be a subset of infinity"

The problem with this statment here is that the number '1' is not a set, it's an integer. Likewise, "infinity" is not a set either. You can have the set containing one, {1}, the set containing infinity, {infinity}, or an infinitly long set {1,2,3...} (the set containing all positive integers). Flannel here is just confusing his terms.

To fix this statment, you could say - the set containing one {1} is a subset of some infinite set. Just be careful not to confuse numbers with sets.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT-10
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.