| Subject: Re: Invitation Letter? |
Author:
christina.
|
[
Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
]
Date Posted: 12:03:54 07/29/01 Sun
In reply to:
Dor
's message, "Re: Invitation Letter?" on 08:18:27 07/29/01 Sun
i didnt mean to keep typing after i said last but not least, hehe. i noticed that, too but i was like ehh too tired. no more. the did i mention? format, though seemed too informal for a formal invite, though.
also, one sixth of the letters means we end up splitting all of the contacts the people make. which might be good to split the burden, but i dont know. i think this all of letters is the one we should all sign.
>>i just typed in the suggested changes so you can see
>>them in context. too bad i dont know where they are
>>anymore, hah.
>>
>
>some of the changes look fine to me, like the
>shortening of the band info that i suggested before
>pasting the letter, etc... but let me comment on some
>other parts...
>
>
>
>Last, but certainly not
>>least, SkimMarket has generously donated two makeup
>>artists who will provide you to a complimentary
>>makeover. The evening
>>>will also feature a silent auction and raffle for
>>>thousands of dollars worth of prizes.
>
>why say last but not least and then add something
>afterward?
>
>
>
>>Thank you for your continuing support,
>>>
>>
>>SCRE Organizers
>
>
>i'd like a somewhat more enthusiastic ending, and we
>should definitely not abbreviate.
>
>i also do think, for what it's worth, there should be
>SOMEONE's name on it. like audrey was saying it just
>helps if people can like attach a name to the project,
>just makes it more personal. i don't see why we can't
>print off like one sixth of our letters with one of
>our names, one six of them with another one of our
>names, etc. etc.
>
>??
>
>maybe?
>
>Dor
[
Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
]
| |
Feedback: 