VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 12[3]4 ]


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 21:53:05 05/06/02 Mon
Author: Rita
Subject: 1983 Blood Type Identification Card

1983 Blood Type Identification Card

When the Michigan healthcare society removed blood tests standards in the
1970's, I believe that the fact should have been placed on the calendar. It
could be an anniversary date that would be celebrated each year, instead of
a blood tests arguing subject.

In 1982 my husband had a neck tumor. After having several tests, Hubby had
blood transfusions in 1983 and he received the card shortly after that
stated the following:

The card identified the blood type: A2 DCcEe

Special (antibody) type: +DAT, S-, s+, K+k+

Also listed were antibodies that were from the Duffy, Kell, and Kidd groups.

It was the first time that I had seen additional letters included in blood
typing, and I was interested in the blood test origination.

The Blood Type Identification was a test done to identify
antibodies that caused problems during blood transfusions. I was under that
impression that a prolonged pathogen-produced illness would leave the body
accepting the unwanted pathogen. Therefore, when blood transfusions were
used to treat the problem that caused my husband's neck tumor, Hubby
ended up with enough infection to disintegrate bones.

My husband was in intensive care when his specialist entered the
room, so I had asked my husband's hematologist about the card, "What is
this?"

Dr. McCutcheon replied, "Go ask the lab. I'm not the only one
who knows about that!"

I did. The laboratory person couldn't understand why anyone
would question the special antibodies. Then after I had questioned the
pathologist who insisted it meant nothing, I continued to ask, "What is the
Blood Type Identification?"

The question had created many problems, ranging from: "blood
was not tested" to "no one questions the Michigan medical gods".

The situation was that blood transfusions were used to treat the blood
problems that had created Hubby's neck tumor. There were
antitumor/antiviral antibiotics discovered in the 1960's when it was known
that all cells mutated and new antibiotics could be made from the mutated
bacteria. I felt that the hematologist had used an inferior treatment. I
believed that the antitumor/antiviral antibiotics should have been used.

The only way a patient could complain was to hire an attorney. The
attorney's excuses ranged from "He (the attorney) had no Michigan
doctor that would state that antitumor/antiviral antibiotics were
withheld" to "He had no hematologist that would explain the
'special antibodies' that were identified".

The American Red Cross directed me to the United Kingdom (UK)
where lived Professor Coombs who the (+DAT) was named after.

None of the attorneys had stated that the Michigan healthcare society
had removed blood test standards back in the 1970's, which I would
call: "Let the patient beware!"

For Michigan doctors to treat a disease symptom and not treat the disease
cause created many additional problems, which included blood test error/lies
and withholding antitumor/antiviral antibiotics. My opinion was that the
Michigan healthcare (medical, psychiatry, and USP) society had included
"The Bible lied when it said that 'the blood feeds the flesh', and throwing
medical lies into the arena would be like a terrorist throwing poison into a
public water supply."

Thereafter, I called a medical liar a member of the Michigan
Medical Liars Society (MMLS), and my question was "Where are the
medical liars going?"

Inferior treatment was again noticed in 1996 when my husband had
common bacteria attack his heart. The Michigan healthcare society had and
still has a recommended treatment that included Gentamicin Sulfate USP to be
used on a 6-week protocol, knowing that it would drug over-dose halfway
through the recommendation. The run-a-way blood test problem had escalated
to recommended drug over-dosing.

It was again a shock to go to a cardiologist that stated: "You make it
though this, it'll be like hitting a home run."

My husband was on the 6-week protocol, recommended Gentamicin Sulfate,
knowing that it would drug over-dose before the 6-weeks was completed. It
was a shocking experience.

Again, Hubby lived, and again no attorney would take the case. Therefore,
the Michigan healthcare recommended inferior treatment of using Gentamicin
Sulfate on a 6-week protocol, knowing that it would drug over-dose remains.

In January 2002, the Michigan cardiologist wrote my husband a letter,
stating that he (the cardiologist) had no control over the medical liars in
his office. I felt that both the 2002 cardiologist's letter and the 1983
hematologist's letter should have been made public.

How are Michigan attorneys assisting medical errors?

My dreams would explain how deception would affect the importance of
blood tests. Two thousand years ago blood tests were unavailable. Yet,
all people knew that the blood was important. The dream explained that if
2000-years-later someone didn't know that the Michigan healthcare society
removed all blood test standards that dated back to the 1970's, the attorney
could assist with additional medical wrong information about any and all
blood test.

Never have I gone to a doctor, expecting to be given inferior medicines or
medical treatment. Again, my dreams assisted me with areas where the
Michigan legal society should be questioned about assisting with drug
over-dosing. I called legalizing drug over-dosing a form of medical poison.
An example would be the Michigan healthcare placing a drug on a 6-week
recommendation, knowing that the drug would drug over-dose. I believe that
the Michigan healthcare society had recommended to other state healthcare
societies to use Gentamicin Sulfate USP on a 6-week protocol, knowing that
it would drug over-dose halfway through the recommended usage.

What would a Michigan attorney call "Health Sabotage"?

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.