VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 12[3]456 ]
Subject: 原來成年人可能永不會承認玩幼稚的遊戲


Author:
無聊人廿二號
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 09:04:34 10/04/01 Thu
In reply to: 極度低能 's message, "又話唔關我事o既,做乜又借d意講我" on 20:34:08 10/03/01 Wed


>另按:將「誰的詩較淺白」企圖哲學化成「一首詩的可理解性如
>何被不同取向的讀者『建立』?」一個which的問題變成how,這
>才是邏輯謬誤,低能。

更低能的是,「一首詩的可理解性如何被不同取向的讀者『建立』?」的意思不正是「不同取向的讀者如何理解同一首詩?」嗎?故作艱深,濫用被動式,不知所謂!邏輯上,讀者先「建立」那「可理解性」﹝這是中文還是英文?﹞,之後當然是再理解,可不理解又怎「建立」?不知所謂!

無聊人五號,你何必再花時間?這群人喜歡將兩個不知算老幾的小輩捧成大師級般來搞個誰的詩怎樣怎樣的擦鞋比賽,由他們去吧!算我們納稅人倒霉,香港的高等教育培育出懂哲學的皮毛就拋哲學,懂詩詞的皮毛就扮詩人的棟樑來。

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:
Subject Author Date
Re: 「無聊」作為停止討論的萬靈丹?無聊人四號10:28:33 10/04/01 Thu


Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.