[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement:
Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor
of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users'
privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your
privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket
to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we
also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.
Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your
contribution is not tax-deductible.)
PayPal Acct: 
Feedback: 
Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):
[ Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 08:46:53 06/25/01 Mon
Author: JG
Subject: Re: Replay to 2 messages by JG
In reply to:
Michael Pyshnov
's message, "Replay to 2 messages by JG" on 07:38:36 06/25/01 Mon
I still can't tell what really happened at U of T . The 'power play' idea was just a guess.
However, your blaming everything on 'jews, communists, etc.' serves no useful purpose and may be the real source of your troubles. If you talked this way when you were a graduate student at U of T, it would have been virtually impossible to give you a Ph.D. The powers that be may simply not have wanted to have someone who talked this way identify himself as a Ph.D. graduate from U of T. These faculty members and fellow graduate students may be people who you think of as supportive of you cause and Ms. Larsen may have simply been chosen to be the 'bad' person who denied you the Ph.D. You (and I) simply do not know what really happened. Agreed that being the principal author on a published paper falls very far short of being given a Ph.D. and would have allowed Larsen and others to pursue this topic further by citing this one published paper(If that paper had been published).
If you wish to study what happened to Fong, just go to any Law library in the USA and look up the 'Fong vs. Perdue' case. You may also find it interesting to use Lexis/Nexis to find out what cases since have used 'Fong vs. Perdue' as a precedent. To me, the Fong case is a frightening example of how the system deals with a troublesome person. Also, I am assuming that the Fong case involves massive perjury - I am guessing that Fong is not a very nice person but that he is telling the truth and that almost everyone else involved in the case - including the judge - is mostly lying.
By the way, I have a Masters degree from U of T and so I am somewhat familiar with that particular University.
[
Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
]
Replies:
[> [>
Re: Replay to 2 messages by JG -- Michael Pyshnov, 09:03:27 06/27/01 Wed
Dear JG!
1. I use the words "Jewish Communism" in this sense: Jews were first to understand how the economy run not by the private people but by the salaried employees (state-run or corporate-run, practically the same) combined with monopoly on mass media can enslave the population; they (not each of them, not every British was an imperialist either) remain the main think tank and the main profit taker of this regime*.
You, may be, are not noticing yourself that when you say that my political remarks or beliefs would make "virtually impossible" to get Ph.D., you are proving my point. Political persecution is here. Can. Charter that does not prohibit discrimination on the basis of political beliefs, is here. Only completely open speech, completely ignoring the threats and pretending that you are still in the free country, can help.
2. No, I had not "talked this way" before:
a) Larsen says - "he left amicably" (doc. 25 and repeated by the department - doc. 26); this is not true since I was outraged by how she disposed of me, but, indeed, she had no complaints for my behaviour. Before that, the relations were friendly, which, and this is very important, allowed her to do what she did without immediate reaction from me. She had not just chosen "to be the bad person" (this I could never prove), but she committed crime, fraud. Please, notice, among many other things, that in the paper that she offered me to publish (with my name first) the number of experiments done was omitted. Later, she herself claimed "hundreds of discs..." I don't care if her ways of coming to the fraud can be verified, but there is no single important fact needed to prove the fraud that can not be found in the documents. (See also my comments in the List of
documents.)
b) I did not realize for many years that political side can play such role as to completely preclude justice. When I started to suspect this (and there were many instances showing this, in academia, in court and with the media), I still kept silence for obvious reason of unpopularity of such accusations. The first time I spoke openly was on July 19, 2000, in letter to CBC Pres. I could not stand blatant defiance of law and clearly politically motivated silence of the press. 14 years was enough; people were asking - "What kind of power does she have to resist for so long?", but I would only shrug my shoulders.
Along with my personal situation and my intolerance toward the present political situation, there is another factor that makes me fight to the end: it is the value of my research. This is also why I went into such depression when my program was trashed. I had shown the way, in time and in
space, how cells divide in the organism. I proved that arrangement of cells in tissue (never previously connected with this kind of function) gives the material basis for developing particular shapes of organs. This research remains unique and valuable, far, far exceeding any Ph.D.
requirements. It is ridiculous to say that it did not deserve the degree. Ask Larsen about it and quote her own words from the papers. In fact, my theory and this direction could have and should have given employment, so to speak, to many researchers. One day it will; and my goal is to make sure that the deeds of this University will be remembered. Not as brain drain, but as kill brain.
*Two things will kill Jewish Communism: 1. The law making the sales figure, not the profit, subject to taxation. (No tax exemptions. This will blast corporations, including media, doing business on taxpayer's money and showing dividends of less than 1%, and return not only power to the people, but also the decent products to the shelves.) 2. Absolute freedom of speech.
[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]
[> [> [>
Re: Replay to 2 messages by JG -- JG, 00:24:21 12/28/01 Fri
Looking at these massages again I see that you still do not get what I am trying to say. JEWS ARE SIMPLY NOT VERY IMPORTANT IN THIS WORLD. NO MORE THAN SOME OLD WOMAN WHO WERE BURNED AS WITCHES HAD SPECIAL POWERS TO CALL UP THE DEVIL OR HELP OR HURT ANYONE. Most people including jews are hurt primarily by their own ethic group because these people are generally closest to them and in the best position to help or hurt. I am vertually certain that 'christians' did not want you to have a Ph. D. from U of T and Ms. Larson was chosen as the person wth the short straw partly because she was jewish.
When a person is wandering on the battlefield of life, it is generally helpful to know who is shooting at them, who is neutral, and who might offer them a glass of water.
I have no way of knowing how good you are as a scientist, but it seems to me that you have much to learn of how to distiguish friend, foe, and neutral.
I hope that I am pouring water on a garden and not gasoline on a fire.
Best wishes to ALL.
p.s. Since this website is public, I hope someone learns something useful from it.
p.p.s. I have found this web site both enlightening and rarher sadly discouraging.
[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]
[> [> [> [>
Re: Replay to 2 messages by JG -- Michael Pyshnov, 13:05:18 12/28/01 Fri
One point you missed: Larsen STOLE my research. And ALL, I repeat, ALL MY STRUGGLE is for the OFFICIAL ADMISSION OF THIS FACT. (Of course, this admission shall necessarily be followed by a number of consequences, for me, for her and for those who covered up the fraud.) But, it's this simple thing - honestly comparing the articles - that cannot be done. Yes, I have this expert admission - from the high authority, President of Canadian Genetics Society and another professor, but they are not those who could take administrative measures and, by the way, refused to go public.
And here the question of political influence arises. Why the officials who should have honestly compared the articles and taken administrative measures, instead, continue their lies for 15 years? Why newspapers and academia and all "society" and "community" are silent?
In Univ. of Michigan, Prof. M. Perlmutter stole ideas (not the degree) from Dr. C. Phinney and the Court said - fraud and gave Phinney $1.6 million. But, when Phinney complained, Univ. covered up. She said: "It's like going to police crying about rape and then being gang-raped by the police." She said she suffered post-traumatic stress disorder, sometimes throwing up as many as 50 times a day (from: The Ithaca Journal). After the conviction of fraud, Perlmutter was again determined not guilty by the University. Not a political influence?
Naturally, I write a lot about the regime, its powerful elements and conditions that continue for 15 years making justice impossible. This is an extraordinary crushing power against elementary truth, nothing like it (save for wars, African Negroes slavery, etc.) was ever met with. If made public (by way of public inquiry or even just by a newspaper), this story would make people to think about THE WAR WITHIN society that is going on. But I need one thing to be established first - that Larsen stole my research. The rest of the story will find its explanation.
The trick is that what I wanted to establish - the theft, COULD NOT BE ESTABLISHED IN A NORMAL WAY FOR 15 YEARS, DESPITE THE FACT THAT EVERY BLOODY OFFICIAL KNOWS IT AND ALL BLOODY "POLICIES AND PROCEDURES" ARE "IN PLACE". Do I need to repeat it all from the beginning?
I am 61 and much worse than Dr. Phinney ever was, the bloody provocation still continues.
[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]
[> [> [> [> [>
Re: Replay to 2 messages by JG -- JG, 13:57:53 01/02/02 Wed
You still don't get it. Many people are victimized all the time by those who should be trustworthy and those of us who are lucky learn to minimize the damage. In recent years a dentist who I thought was great destroyed one of my teeth, caused an infection that was extremily painful, and charged me $1600 dollars. Eventually, three dentists salvaged what was left of the tooth, treated me royaly and all together only charged $1500. Yet, they refused to say that the other dentist had done any think than make a 'honest'. Last year, a doctor who was treating me for a cholesterol problem almost killed me and the crucial action that may have saved my life was taken by me before I found other doctors to work with. When faced with evil, fraud, incompetence, malevolance, etc. all a normal person can do is take 'evasive action' , get on with their life, and give a prayer of thanks that they still have a life to get on with.
The 'rodney king' phenomenon is very rare and people who hope to win big by having someone acknowledge their victimhood are at best waiting for a ship to come in that never sailed and at worst simply to the evil, poison, and malevolance in the world.
The main reason why I have taken so much time with this topic is that it reminds me how lucky I was when I chose to just 'walk away'.
[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]
[> [> [> [> [> [>
Re: Replay to 2 messages by JG -- JG, 00:20:21 01/05/02 Sat
To further clarify my previous comments Mr. Pyshnov, I believe that you have been 'set up' by some very evil and vicious people who are using anti-semitism to put their jewish competitors at a disadvange. Such people are also capable of using rape to deal with female competitors, accusations of witchcraft, communism, anti-communism, christianity, anti-christianity, etc. to defeat competitors with whom they can not compete on a level playing field. Such people usually thing that a game in which the other guy is disarmed, tied up, blindforlded, etc. while they have a gun and a badge is a 'fair' game.
[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]
