[ Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 11:41:51 02/04/02 Mon
Author: Michael Pyshnov
Subject: "OMERTA" - THE CONSPIRACY OF SILENCE MADE THE TRIAL IMPOSSIBLE (SEE ADDED DOCUMENTS!).
In reply to:
's message, "Re: money" on 22:29:53 02/02/02 Sat
1. I am up against a mafia which made any legal action impossible. No witnesses can be found, exactly as it was with Italian Mafia.
People are intimidated. U of T sent a letter from their lawyer to every Prof. in the Department to prevent them from talking. I NOW ADDED 3 DOCUMENTS TO MY WEB SITE, BLACKING OUT THE SIGNATURE OF THE PROFESSOR WHO WROTE THESE LETTERS (HE SENT COPY OF THE SECOND LETTER TO THE U of T PRESIDENT ALSO). READ THEM! (From the link ADDED DOCUMENTS on my List of Documents (last item on the List). In the third letter he says: "...some think that you have a legitimate complaint, but are not willing to get involved". This conspiracy must be put on criminal trial, but the mechanisms of prosecution are subverted also.
I spoke to Eliot Marshall of "Science" magazine and he was ready to publish this case (he said: "No, there is no such thing as "salvaging" of research"), but "Science" was subverted also, nothing was published.
2. A large law firm would take this case without money and get all fees from the defendants later (in fiduciary case it is normal). Numerous law firms refused for "conflict of interest". Many others are scared and said this to me. U of T can make the cost of such trial into millions and drag it into decades. THEY CAN DO THIS BECAUSE THE PRESS IS SILENT. IF NEWSPAPERS COULD REPORT THE EVENTS, NOTHING OF THIS SORT COULD HAVE HAPPENED. Normally, the fees involved would be around $100,000 (in the case of professor's plagiarism in Ottawa, costs were $30,000).
3. Every my document was made by me alone. In mid-November of 1993 I went to law library and on the 8th of March of 1994 I handed Statement of Claim to Larsen and the U of T officer. I continued studying relevant law. The case is prepared for Discovery (called Deposition in U.S.) and trial. I acted as a lawyer for myself in the preliminary court proceedings, including one before Court of Appeal (successfully there). Documents 17,10,14,19,25, etc., were obtained through the court procedure called production of
Affidavits of Documents.
4. Why did I fail to get a Ph.D.? Because Larsen and others stole it. And because before they stole it they took care to get rid of me - see the "academic" decision.
5. "Why can't Larsen just be a Supervisor abusing her power?" - Of course, she is. What you call "conspiracy theories" are explaining why she and others are still not in jail; "theories" are related to the cover-up that is continuing now. I am not trying to explain her criminal abuse of power, dishonesty, fraud, etc. by a conspiracy theory.
Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
[> [> [> [>
Re: "OMERTA" - THE CONSPIRACY OF SILENCE MADE THE TRIAL IMPOSSIBLE (SEE ADDED DOCUMENTS!). -- JG, 21:26:19 02/04/02 Mon
I looked at the documents you suggested - the recently posted 3 documents. I presume that you notice that the person who wrote that letter is very careful not to comment on the merits of your claim but is only critical of the procedures used and the lack of clear criteria of how this type of problem should be dealt with.
Also, I am still curious why you do not use your legal expertice to become a lawyer or paralegal, etc. This would strenghten your position, allow you to help others, etc.
If you need $30K or even $100K, I do not see how GSU can ever collect such a sum. However, if you got a law degree, the problem would become much more solvable.
[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]
Forum timezone: GMT-8|
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2016 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.