Re: To all Smashing Pumpkins detractor -- Papa M Bulletin Bored

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: [1], 2 ]

Subject: Re: To all Smashing Pumpkins detractor

Author:
Johan

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 20:31:14 01/21/02 Mon
In reply to: W w I i S s H h T t O o L d I i E e 's message, "Re: To all Smashing Pumpkins detractor" on 17:04:44 01/21/02 Mon

ok, you give me some noteworthy 90's bands to compare them to and i'll use those. none exist. i didn't even consider the genre of music when i named PJ and nirvana. i was more thinking of the more popular bands of the past decade from the same era of the pumpkins. but if you would have rather i chose the noteworthy one-hit-wonder bands, i could have just as easily done that. or maybe some punk bands? i picked 2 bands out of the air and i think i picked some damn good ones. it had nothing to do with grunge.

>WHY MUST YOU MENTION NIRVANA AND PEARL JAM IN
>COMPARISON TO SMASHING PUMPKINS.... IT ONLY FUELS THE
>IDEA THAT SP IS THE SAME AS THOSE BANDS "grunge" IS A
>DIRTY WORDS.... PUMPKINS R THE ONLY BAND FROM THAT
>ERA TO ACTUALLY EVOLVE MUSICALLY. NOT THAT THE OTHERS
>R BAD THEY JUST SHOULDN'T BE LABELED AS THE SAME TYPE
>OF MUSIC BECAUSE THEY ARE MUCH DIFFERENT

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]