Create a New Forum Admin Login Member Login Contribute to Voyager Search VoyForums Help Desk VoyForums Exchange VoyForums Directory/Categories VoyForums Homepage VoyForums News FAQ - Frequently Asked Questions

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time ]

Subject: I don’t anyone thinks it was “on purpose” & the person above may not know how it works but I’m very aware of how the process works and you can spin it however you want both Wilmington and JoCo made an egregious error and took away a crowning moment for one young lady & it just makes people question everything else that was happening at that pageant. The eligibility criteria is laid out very clearly. How did both those committees missed her age and her previously being married is beyond me. But MNC will probably ignore this just as they have before. We love this program on a whole but the last few years beginning the year with the teen judging fiasco it’s hard to continue to support this program especially monetary support when it appears dishonest, negligent, irresponsible behavior continues to happen. Author: No name [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ] Date Posted: 07:17:06 02/01/26 Sun In reply to: 's message, "This statement is so clear that you don’t have a clue how this works - there wasn’t anything dishonest happening on the committees side. This was an error that wasn’t caught in the registration process for. MAO and let’s remember this isn’t the first local . The mistake was made above the local level, a confirmation was given to this contestant that was in error. It’s easier to sit back and cast your judgement and spin narratives and lies. But at the end of the day, this has been awful for all involved. Who would purposely let this happen..no one" on 04:12:41 02/01/26 Sun [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]