your grading system leaves a lot to be desired(nm) -- The Big West Beat Forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 18:43:58 11/19/01 Mon
Author: Buckwheat
Subject: your grading system leaves a lot to be desired(nm)
In reply to: No 33 's message, "Grades for week one." on 15:42:02 11/19/01 Mon

>The grades for week one! (my personal opinions, of
>course, based on what I believe national preception
>were--not whether team over or underachieved)
>
>Pacific-- A (defeated a WCC opponent away--One of the
>conferences we should schedule and beat--And the
>Tigers did proud)
>
>Utah State-- B (played a Big Sky team at home and won
>handily-- should always beat Big Sky and lower rated
>conferences at home)
>
>UCI-- B- (defeated a WCC opponent at home--not an
>impressive margin however--favored by 15 and won by 7)
>
>Long Beach C+ (defeated two lower level teams on
>neutral court--Would have received much higher grade
>had they not been blown out by Ore--a close game with
>the Ducks would have given much higher grade)
>
>Northridge C (game against team from higher
>conference, but those must be won at home and double
>digit losses at home are not good)
>
>Idaho-- C (game against non-Div I team never deserves
>better than a C--was a blowout however)
>
>UCR C (Loss away against a middle of the road WCC
>team--Not double digit loss however)
>
>Santa Barbara D+ ( A win at home but by less than 10
>against a non-Div I team is not a passing grade)
>
>Fullerton D+ (expected result with all height on the
>bench, but still must do better vs WCC)
>
>Cal Poly D (tough place to play but an 18 pt loss
>against a Big Sky team is not good)
>
>So we came out of the weekend with a 5-5 record
>against Div I opposition in the west -- 2-2 vs WCC;
>0-1 vs Pac 10; 1-1 vs Big Sky and 0-1 vs WAC

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]