VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1[2]34 ]


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 15:28:55 07/02/01 Mon
Author: aims
Author Host/IP: NoHost / 195.92.237.210
Subject: Re: Dearest Laardvark....
In reply to: Kevin. 's message, "Re: Dearest Laardvark...." on 08:33:09 07/02/01 Mon

*also doesn't want to get into big brawl, or shawl for that matter*

BUTT [sic];

Kevin, when I first spoke to you, b4 I got drunk, and I remember this quite well, you said the words "Hannah had better watch out" this was in reference to Laaard being 'bi' you told me, and that her comments MAY offend him. You're right that you didn't say he WAS/IS offended, but you did say the phrase "watch out" and aimed it (by name) to Han.

tis all

amos
-xxx-




>Kevin will explain his comments once more as they
>appear to have been twisted once again.
>
> All i said was that Laard might be offended, i
>never said that he was and i tried my hardest to
>explain that. As it happens he is not offended so
>everything is ok and there is no need for Hannah to
>tone anything down. I was merely saying that i wrote
>what i wrote just in case people might have been
>offended. This is why i requested that Hannah be a
>little careful (but not to 'Watch Out') in what she
>writes. But it is patently obvious that Hannah is
>going to write what she wants anyway, regardless if
>she offends anyone or not. She never has 'toned down'
>in the past and she never will in the future. If
>someone disagrees with her point of view, they will
>either a) be told to lighten up. b) told that it was
>joke or c)told that this is a forum for friends who
>are not offended by her comments and therefore it
>doesn't matter what she writes or d) fuck off. Other
>variations also exist but these represent the standard
>responses.
> So you have been fooled by my 'comedy genius'
>angle, already? Sorry to confuse and disappoint but it
>was pure, unadulterated, sarcasm which is related to
>the aforementioned point b). This all started with the
>unforgettable "i hope you are not on a train when it
>crashes" joke directed towards me some months ago. I
>don't forget jokes like this easily and in subsequent
>months there have been other serious sounding
>statements that have been brushed off as merely a
>joke. It seems that Hannah sees herself as a bit of a
>joker and i think she possesses the type of black (not
>meant in any racist way) humour to possibly make it in
>comedy, especially the Northern pub/club scene. But
>with a little more practice of her repertoire she
>could then progress to eventually make UK television
>and with a bit more exposure to her 'so bad its good'
>brand of comedy she possibly could take the world by
>storm. Hannah, have you got any GOOD "jokes" left to
>tell? i would love to hear them. I thought i put my
>point across well and that it required no further
>explanation. Obviously i was wrong. Well i didn't want
>anyone to misrepresent me so this is why i have
>responded to this message. I hope this doesn't
>degenerate into more pointless arguing. Anyway if i
>don't find a house/flat in the next few days i'll be
>back in Coventry until September/October time.
>Most Sincerely,
>Kevin.
>xxxxxxx
>
>P.S Hannah, where were you on Saturday? I had the
>great pleasure of speaking to Sally, Aimee and Lyndsay
>but not to you.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


Replies:




Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.