Re: You need to look at this legally not emotionally -- Margaritaville NFL Forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, [2], 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 00:18:39 08/25/15 Tue
Author: Niner
Author Host/IP: 71.135.162.147
Subject: Re: You need to look at this legally not emotionally
In reply to: C-Hawk Watcher 's message, "You're way off" on 11:06:15 08/24/15 Mon

>If Brady sued the NFL..it would be a breach of
>contract suit...which uses preponderance of the
>evidence.
>
>In the A. Peterson case, first, it was the Minnesota
>judge who bends over backwards for the union.
>
>Second, all the evidence was there for the NFL to
>examine and they went decided the punishment based on
>known facts. That didn't happen here since Brady was
>so uncooperative during and after the investigation.
>
>Text messages from the equipment guys show that Brady
>knew and demanded the balls be deflated way back in
>October. Unless you believe that they were made up
>texts back dated to October.
>
>This judge is looking at if the process for
>determining the suspension was fair. I don't see
>anything in it that is unfair. 4 games would be the
>MINIMUM for fairness...should have been 4-8 in my
>opinion.

Which text are you referring to that proves Brady knew?
What was the rule for punishment for under inflating game balls in the CBA?
Why did the Well report claim that Boyle's Law doesn't exist? Where did they get the science to disprove that air pressure decreases as temperature decreases?

I understand that you refuse to use any logic in this and have yet to show any on why Brady deserves 4 games much like the Wells report was a witch hunt to try to prove a case with no evidence.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

I am using logic and science..you should try it -- C-Hawk Watcher, 11:39:04 08/26/15 Wed
- Re: You have to undstand science first -- Niner, 10:37:43 09/03/15 Thu
  - Apparently you don't understand the concept of time -- C-Hawk Watcher, 11:44:51 09/03/15 Thu
    - Re: Apparently you don't understand the concept of time -- Niner, 13:15:01 09/03/15 Thu
      - I disagre with judge, Sex. harrassment DOES NOT equal intergrity of game -- C-Hawk Watcher, 11:36:07 09/04/15 Fri