Re: I voted for the taxes. -- Margaritaville NFL Forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, [7], 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 18:28:10 11/06/13 Wed
Author: Bearman
Author Host/IP: 65.129.215.166
Subject: Re: I voted for the taxes.
In reply to: 5280 's message, "I voted for the taxes." on 18:09:03 11/06/13 Wed

>>>DENVER (Reuters) - A Colorado measure to impose sales
>>>and excise taxes of 25 percent on newly legalized
>>>recreational marijuana and earmark the first $40
>>>million in revenue for public schools was approved by
>>>voters on Tuesday, Governor John Hickenlooper said.
>>>
>>>"We will do everything in our power to make sure kids
>>>don't smoke pot and that we don't have people driving
>>>who are high. This ballot measure gives Colorado the
>>>ability to regulate marijuana properly,"
>>>
>>> LOL. Yeah, right. It's going to ensure that the
>>>black market keeps humming right along, tax free.
>>>Make sure kids don't get it? Like, alcohol? I
>>>think it's the right thing to do, I just think that
>>>statement is ridiculous.,
>
>I think it strikes the right balance in pricing the
>end product. You talk about black market. Well I
>think 25% isn't enough incentive to grow/sell under
>the table, but is enough to discourage use, to a
>degree.
>
>Will adults pay the tax and then resell to kids?
>Sure. That's the closest analogy to alcohol. You
>don't see pushers selling kids homemade vodka. Kids
>get it through resale or taking from their folks.
>And, it's been a helluva lot easier for kids to get
>pot than alcohol.

I guess I should have separated the 2 comments.
1) The higher price will send Johnny back to "his guy".
2) Taxing it will do no more to keep it away from kids than taxing alcohol does.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

It's too high (no pun intended). -- New Ceeb�, 07:46:03 11/07/13 Thu

I can't wait till Texas says it's OK -- HD, 08:37:31 11/07/13 Thu

Let's see... -- 5280, 11:47:48 11/07/13 Thu

Organic, dude. -- New Ceeb�, 11:58:50 11/07/13 Thu