VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1[2]3 ]
Subject: Re: scrutineering


Author:
Becks
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 12:07:00 05/05/02 Sun
In reply to: interested spectator 's message, "scrutineering" on 19:56:57 05/01/02 Wed

Answers below :o)

>Where in the rule book does it say anything about,
>e.g. all external seams taped, all helmet bolts taped,
>no rusty face guards, no peeling or flaking paint on
>any equipment...)

It really depends on which "rule book" you are refereeing to.

You may be surprised to learn that NZ V1.0 (written by Troy Lipsham) is not the sole creation of one single man or NZer (he is a bit of a legend, but he's not superman)

The NZ version of the rules could be described as a simplified version of the full ICF canoe polo rules. I only have the 2001 version of ICF, but it is 56 A4 pages long.

NZ rules primarily present the main gist of the rules of Canoe Polo.
e.g.
If you look, you will see very little information on gear specs. It isn't because in NZ we don't care what you play in, but more that they are not so important to the everyday player due to most gear available in NZ being designed to meet ICF specifications, which are relatively comprehensive.

My comments refereed to the highest level of scrutineering I have encountered (2000 Canoe Polo World Championships).
-At this event, external seems were required to be taped, all bolts (including those used for footpegs and to fasten face-guards to helmets) were also required to be taped.

I feel confident "rusty face guards" would be classified as a "sharp or dangerous part" (pg48, ICF Canoe Polo Rules, 2001)
Aside from the risk of tetanus, flaking paint and rust can be a nasty thing to have imbedded in your skin.

>I think some of the equipment at the pools needs to
>be looked at eg goals, 6 metre marking, score cards
>unobstructed sidelines etc just to name a few.

On this I would definately agree with you. I have refereed at several national League meets and have been particularly disapointed with the absence of this equipment. With the exception of the goals, this equipment can be obtained for a very small financial outlay.
Under the NZCPA National League Guidelines, this equipment is the responsibility of the hosting teams. Perhaps you would consider passing on your concerns to our Competitions Director, if you do not feel comfortable approaching the hosting club directly?

It is great that our spectators are becoming more educated about our sport. Additionally that they are keen enough to hunt down our national site and post their opinions! Awsome!

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT+11
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.