Question for Phil, et al -- News Addiction Recovery Forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: [1], 2 ]

Subject: Question for Phil, et al

Author:
S

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 21:11:05 03/31/02 Sun
In reply to: Suth 's message, "The Vixen" on 19:56:29 03/31/02 Sun

Sharmalee claims that the report that US commandos participated in the arrests last week in Pakistan was false. "Propoganda." I noticed that PNS has a retraction of that in an article. Have you seen retractions anywhere else?

And why do they want this to be misinformation? Is it that insulting to think that US officers are assisting Pakistani officers within Pakistan?

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[> [> Subject: Re: Question for Phil, et al
Author: Philip Cyriac [ Edit \| View ]	Date Posted: 21:53:10 03/31/02 Sun They are just mimicking their govt position. That's all. Truth is optional. Everyone knows that if the Pak authorities knew of the raid, the bad guys would have been tipped of by the ISI.