VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 12345678[9] ]


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 20:30:02 03/14/02 Thu
Author: Chris
Subject: Re: Ed McMann
In reply to: Brian Bell 's message, "Re: Ed McMann" on 16:16:47 03/14/02 Thu

>I agree, I think Ed is not that good. His delivery is
>choppy, his infexions are not that good. It just
>sounds painful to listen to it.
>
>I liked David Perry who always sat in for Casey on
>Casey's Top 40.

IMO, it's a toss-up between Ed McMann and David Perry. I just don't see how so many people voted for Charlie Van Dyke as the best guest host. He was so dull. As was Mark Elliott, who sounded much like Charlie Van Dyke (that I can remember - I haven't heard Charlie Van Dyke since early 1988).

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


Replies:



Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.