VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 123456789[10] ]
Subject: Re: We just voted on this in 2004 once again I am sure the federal courts will


Author:
Duncan7
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 17:09:43 03/11/07 Sun
In reply to: Bev 's message, "We just voted on this in 2004 once again I am sure the federal courts will" on 10:38:34 03/11/07 Sun

They do have say if it's contaminating public lands and these day we can trace just about anything. I don't think your telling the whole truth bev. You've got a dem congress now and you've had a dem congress before so as far as a big conspiracy it doesn't hold water. If you can't get things done with a rep congress and you can't get things done with a dem congress maybe you need to reevaluate what it is you want done. Your obviously missing something somewhere.

>knock it down .What needs to happen is for ca to be
>split into 2 or 3 states so they do not have so much
>say in congress with all their congressional reps that
>drown out smaller states. Its mainly ca who is sending
>the crap as they have so much more of it than other
>states. Also nuclear waste from military ships is
>stored at bremerton ship yards. We have no say over a
>military base . The feds take over lands and the state
>normally has no say about,you show me the state who
>has taken back federal land thru lawsuits or any other
>way until the feds are willing to do something the
>state has little say . In fact it would be stupid for
>wa to take over hanford as we did not make the mess
>the feds did and other states are . other than that
>nuclear reator at hanford for weapons purposes ws
>Never finished the reactors that were being built here
>by private enterprise for power as the people said no
>. so they are sitting not finished .
> cheer up duncan they are talking of building a huge
>solar farm and windmills in the area that hanford is
>not on the reservation but on the land that cannot be
>used for other resons due to the pollution from
>hanford during the cold war years.
> what do children have to do with it . they are more
>susceptable to radiation than adults are . I was part
>of a study for the radiation let loose by the fed
>reactor at handford during the 40s when i was a child.
>The study is all archived at gonzaga university in
>Spokane they were hoping that someday some intensive
>study would be done on the results of the info. I
>suppose you do not know that the 3 of the 4 highest
>incedences of ms in the world are in the 3 counties in
>was state directly in hte wind patterm n or hanford.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.