Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:
Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):
[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, [10] ] |
Subject: Re: We just voted on this in 2004 once again I am sure the federal courts will | |
Author: Duncan7 |
[
Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
]
Date Posted: 17:09:43 03/11/07 Sun In reply to: Bev 's message, "We just voted on this in 2004 once again I am sure the federal courts will" on 10:38:34 03/11/07 Sun They do have say if it's contaminating public lands and these day we can trace just about anything. I don't think your telling the whole truth bev. You've got a dem congress now and you've had a dem congress before so as far as a big conspiracy it doesn't hold water. If you can't get things done with a rep congress and you can't get things done with a dem congress maybe you need to reevaluate what it is you want done. Your obviously missing something somewhere. >knock it down .What needs to happen is for ca to be >split into 2 or 3 states so they do not have so much >say in congress with all their congressional reps that >drown out smaller states. Its mainly ca who is sending >the crap as they have so much more of it than other >states. Also nuclear waste from military ships is >stored at bremerton ship yards. We have no say over a >military base . The feds take over lands and the state >normally has no say about,you show me the state who >has taken back federal land thru lawsuits or any other >way until the feds are willing to do something the >state has little say . In fact it would be stupid for >wa to take over hanford as we did not make the mess >the feds did and other states are . other than that >nuclear reator at hanford for weapons purposes ws >Never finished the reactors that were being built here >by private enterprise for power as the people said no >. so they are sitting not finished . > cheer up duncan they are talking of building a huge >solar farm and windmills in the area that hanford is >not on the reservation but on the land that cannot be >used for other resons due to the pollution from >hanford during the cold war years. > what do children have to do with it . they are more >susceptable to radiation than adults are . I was part >of a study for the radiation let loose by the fed >reactor at handford during the 40s when i was a child. >The study is all archived at gonzaga university in >Spokane they were hoping that someday some intensive >study would be done on the results of the info. I >suppose you do not know that the 3 of the 4 highest >incedences of ms in the world are in the 3 counties in >was state directly in hte wind patterm n or hanford. [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ] |