VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 12345[6]78910 ]
Subject: Stop whining


Author:
Mo' Green
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 14:53:25 04/26/07 Thu
In reply to: Oropan 's message, "If you read the original post you wouldn't have to ask that!" on 11:38:12 04/26/07 Thu

>All you ever post is personal attacks. You never
>debate the subject of any post.
It takes you 5 posts to finally identify the obscure reference that was supposed to be your point and you call an inquire as to what you're talking about a "personal attack"? BTW, I had a one sentence question you failed to answer. Should I start whinning now?

>
>
>
>
>
>
>>So you think we should do nothing to persuade China to
>>take action, or what?
>>
>>>That pretty much explains what I was pointing to.
>>>But,of course, if global warming is just a political
>>>game with you, then it doesn't matter.
>>>Oh yes, the article didn't even address India!
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>>We all want a liveable World.
>>>>>BUT....
>>>>>How about commenting on the original sudject of
>this
>>>>>tread!
>>>>
>>>>You posted an article without any context and
>>included
>>>>a snide remark about do-gooders. You got my
>comment.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> when we were young. So we invented them, you
>>>>>>>arrogant little shithead!!
>>>>>>> Now...... what are you doing for the next
>>>>>>>generation??"
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Great little story. Proves my point, oh vapid
>>one.
>>>>>>You just got finished deriding those who would
>help
>>>>>>the next generation as "do-gooders". Oh BTW,
>isn't
>>>a
>>>>>>liveable world a superior generational gift than
>>all
>>>>>>the material things you mentioned?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Again, just trying to gauge the extent of your
>>>>>>>>delusion.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Just trying to understant better how your pea
>>>>>brain
>>>>>>>>>>works.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>Report: China Will Pass U.S. As Polluter
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>Apr 24 01:41 AM US/Eastern
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>SHANGHAI, China (AP) - China will pass the
>>>>United
>>>>>>>>>>>States as the world's biggest source of
>>>>>greenhouse
>>>>>>>>>>>gasses this year, an official with the
>>>>>>>International
>>>>>>>>>>>Energy Agency was quoted as saying.
>>>>>>>>>>>China had been forecast to surpass the U.S.
>in
>>>>>>>2010,
>>>>>>>>>>>but its sizzling economic growth has pushed
>>the
>>>>>>>date
>>>>>>>>>>>forward, the IEA's chief economist, Fatih
>>>Birol,
>>>>>>>was
>>>>>>>>>>>quoted as saying in an interview appearing in
>>>>>>>>>>>Tuesday's Wall Street Journal newspaper.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>"In the past couple of months, economic
>growth
>>>>>and
>>>>>>>>>>>related coal consumption has grown at such an
>>>>>>>>>>>unexpected rate," Birol was quoted as saying.
>>>>>>>>China's
>>>>>>>>>>>rising emissions will effectively cancel out
>>>>>>>>attempts
>>>>>>>>>>>by other countries to reduce their own, he
>>>>said.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>Those comments follow the weekend release of
>a
>>>>>>>>>Chinese
>>>>>>>>>>>government report detailing the costs of
>>>climate
>>>>>>>>>>>change but asserting that the country should
>>>>>focus
>>>>>>>>on
>>>>>>>>>>>development before cutting greenhouse gas
>>>>>>>>emissions.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>Higher than average temperatures meant
>>>spreading
>>>>>>>>>>>deserts, worsening droughts, shrinking
>>glaciers
>>>>>>and
>>>>>>>>>>>increased spread of diseases, said the
>report,
>>>>>>>>>>>compiled by more than a dozen government
>>>bodies.
>>>>>>It
>>>>>>>>>>>said emission limits were unfair and would
>>>>>>>constrain
>>>>>>>>>>>China's current energy and manufacturing
>>>>>>>>industries.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>China is a signatory to the Kyoto Protocol on
>>>>>>>>>reducing
>>>>>>>>>>>greenhouse gasses, but is exempt from its
>>>>>>>>>restrictions
>>>>>>>>>>>because it is a developing country.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>The Paris-based IEA advises developed country
>>>on
>>>>>>>>>>>energy policy.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>href="http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id
>=
>>D
>>>8
>>>>O
>>>>>M
>>>>>>P
>>>>>>>H
>>>>>>>>M
>>>>>>>>>8
>>>>>>>>>>0
>>>>>>>>>>>&show_article=1">http://www.breitbart.com/art
>i
>>c
>>>l
>>>>e
>>>>>.
>>>>>>p
>>>>>>>h
>>>>>>>>p
>>>>>>>>>?
>>>>>>>>>>i
>>>>>>>>>>>d=D8OMPHM80&show_article=1


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:
Subject Author Date
The truth hurts doesn't itOropan15:40:29 04/26/07 Thu


Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.