Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your
contribution is not tax-deductible.)
PayPal Acct: 
Feedback: 
Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):
| [ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, [6], 7, 8, 9, 10 ] |
| Subject: The truth hurts doesn't it | |
|
Author: Oropan |
[
Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
]
Date Posted: 15:40:29 04/26/07 Thu In reply to: Mo' Green 's message, "Stop whining" on 14:53:25 04/26/07 Thu >>All you ever post is personal attacks. You never >>debate the subject of any post. >It takes you 5 posts to finally identify the obscure >reference that was supposed to be your point and you >call an inquire as to what you're talking about a >"personal attack"? BTW, I had a one sentence question >you failed to answer. Should I start whinning now? > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>So you think we should do nothing to persuade China >to >>>take action, or what? >>> >>>>That pretty much explains what I was pointing to. >>>>But,of course, if global warming is just a political >>>>game with you, then it doesn't matter. >>>>Oh yes, the article didn't even address India! >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>>We all want a liveable World. >>>>>>BUT.... >>>>>>How about commenting on the original sudject of >>this >>>>>>tread! >>>>> >>>>>You posted an article without any context and >>>included >>>>>a snide remark about do-gooders. You got my >>comment. >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> when we were young. So we invented them, you >>>>>>>>arrogant little shithead!! >>>>>>>> Now...... what are you doing for the next >>>>>>>>generation??" >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Great little story. Proves my point, oh vapid >>>one. >>>>>>>You just got finished deriding those who would >>help >>>>>>>the next generation as "do-gooders". Oh BTW, >>isn't >>>>a >>>>>>>liveable world a superior generational gift than >>>all >>>>>>>the material things you mentioned? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>Again, just trying to gauge the extent of your >>>>>>>>>delusion. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>Just trying to understant better how your pea >>>>>>brain >>>>>>>>>>>works. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>Report: China Will Pass U.S. As Polluter >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>Apr 24 01:41 AM US/Eastern >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>SHANGHAI, China (AP) - China will pass the >>>>>United >>>>>>>>>>>>States as the world's biggest source of >>>>>>greenhouse >>>>>>>>>>>>gasses this year, an official with the >>>>>>>>International >>>>>>>>>>>>Energy Agency was quoted as saying. >>>>>>>>>>>>China had been forecast to surpass the U.S. >>in >>>>>>>>2010, >>>>>>>>>>>>but its sizzling economic growth has pushed >>>the >>>>>>>>date >>>>>>>>>>>>forward, the IEA's chief economist, Fatih >>>>Birol, >>>>>>>>was >>>>>>>>>>>>quoted as saying in an interview appearing >in >>>>>>>>>>>>Tuesday's Wall Street Journal newspaper. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>"In the past couple of months, economic >>growth >>>>>>and >>>>>>>>>>>>related coal consumption has grown at such >an >>>>>>>>>>>>unexpected rate," Birol was quoted as >saying. >>>>>>>>>China's >>>>>>>>>>>>rising emissions will effectively cancel out >>>>>>>>>attempts >>>>>>>>>>>>by other countries to reduce their own, he >>>>>said. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>Those comments follow the weekend release of >>a >>>>>>>>>>Chinese >>>>>>>>>>>>government report detailing the costs of >>>>climate >>>>>>>>>>>>change but asserting that the country should >>>>>>focus >>>>>>>>>on >>>>>>>>>>>>development before cutting greenhouse gas >>>>>>>>>emissions. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>Higher than average temperatures meant >>>>spreading >>>>>>>>>>>>deserts, worsening droughts, shrinking >>>glaciers >>>>>>>and >>>>>>>>>>>>increased spread of diseases, said the >>report, >>>>>>>>>>>>compiled by more than a dozen government >>>>bodies. >>>>>>>It >>>>>>>>>>>>said emission limits were unfair and would >>>>>>>>constrain >>>>>>>>>>>>China's current energy and manufacturing >>>>>>>>>industries. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>China is a signatory to the Kyoto Protocol >on >>>>>>>>>>reducing >>>>>>>>>>>>greenhouse gasses, but is exempt from its >>>>>>>>>>restrictions >>>>>>>>>>>>because it is a developing country. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>The Paris-based IEA advises developed >country >>>>on >>>>>>>>>>>>energy policy. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>href="http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?i >d >>= >>>D >>>>8 >>>>>O >>>>>>M >>>>>>>P >>>>>>>>H >>>>>>>>>M >>>>>>>>>>8 >>>>>>>>>>>0 >>>>>>>>>>>>&show_article=1">http://www.breitbart.com/ar >t >>i >>>c >>>>l >>>>>e >>>>>>. >>>>>>>p >>>>>>>>h >>>>>>>>>p >>>>>>>>>>? >>>>>>>>>>>i >>>>>>>>>>>>d=D8OMPHM80&show_article=1 [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ] |
| Subject | Author | Date |
| I am not waiting 5 more posts to find out what that non-sequitor is supposed to mean.. | Mo' Green | 16:14:57 04/26/07 Thu |