Kip's position on salvation -- RSQUBF discussion forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, [5], 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 23:20:15 10/13/04 Wed
Author: John
Subject: Kip's position on salvation
In reply to: Joe 's message, "Re: Baptism vs. ICC Baptism" on 18:04:47 10/13/04 Wed

>Isn't Kip's recent position just a rehash of the old
>position? From my limited understanding, you couldn't
>be baptized unless you were a ICC disciple. So the
>real requirement to be saved was to become a ICC
>disciple, a much harder thing than the act (ritual?)
>of getting baptized. Christian = Disciple = Saved. Not
>a Disciple = Not a Christian = Not saved.

Yes, Kip's position is the same except a few words are changed. The Acts 11 verse was used to say Disciple=Christian=Saved, then disciple was defined as totally committed, super-evangelistic, totally obedient person that would go anywhere, do anything by any means necessary to baptize a lost world.

>That being the case, the ICC's teaching on salvation
>is not much different from UBF's, though UBF doesn't
>require baptism.

That's what I am begininng to understand. It amazes me that the ICC would say that no one was like them. Some still hold to this view!

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]