"We've changed, not that we needed to change." -- RSQUBF discussion forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, [9], 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 12:54:18 08/03/04 Tue
Author: Joe
Subject: "We've changed, not that we needed to change."
In reply to: Bong-Jin Kang 's message, "Re: "Things have changed" article?" on 19:46:27 07/29/04 Thu

>As I said on 8th,July's post, the Korean UBF top [John Jun]
>leader insisted many changes has occured since SL's
>death.
>
>He requested any present problems in ubf and any
>problems of SB if I want to argue with him further.

John Jun (and other UBF leaders) insist that unspecified things have changed and insist that people talk about the current state of UBF. Does this imply an admission on their part that there were serious problems in past? Of course not. Their trick is to say that "they've changed" without ever acknowledging--and at the same time actively minimizing--past wrongdoing. They want their cake and eat it, too. See John Jun's recent responses to "past" UBF problems.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]