Re: School's Athletic Board -- CROSSPORTS: Holy Cross Crusaders Sports Message Board

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Thursday, April 09, 04:29:49pm [ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, [7], 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 13:13:41 07/20/04 Tue
Author: pitt65
Subject: Re: School's Athletic Board
In reply to: kesiwick 's message, "Re: Just Spoke to Development/ Pat McCarthy" on 11:09:01 07/19/04 Mon

As a follow-up to kes' statment, I've e-mailed the athletic media office to inquire as to why the factual result of our ECAC bid has not appeared on our athletic board so that the alums who do not have access to the Telegram or who do not follow Crossports can be informed of this important development.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[> [> [> [> Re: School's Athletic Board-Summer Hiatus? -- NTKHC64, 14:11:01 07/20/04 Tue

Other than stories about three new coaches, there is nothing "new" on the HC board. There is plenty of old: the hockey game with North Dakota, Bigda drafted and a bunch of scores that are months old. I realize that the sports info staff is short handed now, but the sports activity is nil so why don't they get rid of the stale items? Compare with the Colgate sites, its own and paid, and see how much more FUTURE info is there.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> Parliament...Big Ben...Parliament...Big Ben... -- HC1843, 14:41:01 07/20/04 Tue

Ever get the feeling like we've been here before. NTK, the fact of the matter is that unless or until Dick Regan connects the state of the Athletics website with yearly raises, the motivation levels to do anything even mediocre with the site will be one that would have made the Soviet's proud.

Quite honestly, what is in it for anyone in the athletic department to care about the embarassing state of the website when it appears that Dick Regan could not give a hoot. Until DR cares, no one will care. Why Mr. Regan allows such a poor reflection of the schools athletic department, and thus himself, to continue is beyond me...oh wait, "budget constraints". Nevermind, I forgot about that excuse.

Cheers.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> [> Answer from HC !! -- pitt65, 15:55:48 07/20/04 Tue

The reason I tried the athletic dept. on the HC board [despite the summer hiatus] was that I saw some mid-July releases about assistant coaches. I got an e-mail back from Larry Napolitano which reads as follows:

"I have forwarded your message onto our athletic director. As far as I am aware no official decision has been made by the ECAC regarding possible expansion. We have applied but they have not denied or accepted our application as of yet. Anything you have heard regarding Quinnipiac or anyone else being accepted is not accurate. To my knowledge, there has not been any formal invitations extended to join the conference."

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> Re: Answer from HC !! -- kesiwick, 16:05:11 07/20/04 Tue

they should demand a retraction from the Telegram for their erroneous headline last week !

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Re: What the T&G Stated -- NTKHC64, 16:15:15 07/20/04 Tue

"The ECAC athletic directors committee has recommended Quinnipiac as it 12th member institution to replace Vermont...The recommendation will now go before the ECAC's policy committee which will have ultimate approval, and a final decision is expected later this month. There is a chance the policy committee could go in a different direction, but that is not likely."

The headline in the online edition was "ECAC says no to HC."

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> Re: Answer from HC !! -- NTKHC64, 16:10:32 07/20/04 Tue

The majority of the ECAC ADs recommended Quinnipiac as its top choice. The ECAC Policy Committee could reject the suggestion so technically the reply is correct.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Re: Answer from HC !! -- pitt65, 16:27:16 07/20/04 Tue

NTK: Any more info - eg. Was the AD decision by a large or bare majority? Will our Administration be given a chance to go before the ECAC policy committee? -etc.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]