VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 12345678[9]10 ]
Subject: Re: Gina, i know you're not this niave...


Author:
Gina
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 02:19:05 07/30/08 Wed
In reply to: LBF 's message, "Gina, i know you're not this niave..." on 21:33:22 07/29/08 Tue

So, what you are saying is, money is going to be made off the baby's pictures either way.

And, whose fault is that? Who owns responsiblity for the manner these children will be hunted their entire life?

Oh, that is right, I keep forgetting, celebrity children aren't really entitled to a normal exisitance because of their famous parents. They are a hot comodity to make money for charity. I keep forgetting, that was a big part of the reason these two hooked up in the first place. To make a Hollywood power couple who could save the world.*eyeroll*

You are right, I am not that niave,I keep forgetting they don't play by the same rules as the rest of the world, including their peers in the business. They are above all of that because they are the biggest stars in the world. I wonder how the other new Hollywood parents feel that did sell their children to the media but kept the money for themselves. Sure makes them look less than human compared to Brangelina.

You are right LBF, of course auctioning off their offspring to the highest bidder is the only way for them to deal with the paps chasing them. The hardest part for me is when they complain that they don't recieve any privacy after they pimp them off to the media. Of course they feel they are above all of that no matter what they do with the money. Lets watch and see what happens to those children long term. It appears that Brangelina is the power couple that started auctioning their children off first, and of course, all the others fall in a perfect line behind them. For the exception of Nicole Kidman, which is a delightful surprise coming from her. Must be Keith Urbans influence on her. Good for them. Lets see if they get the chase like Brangelina does.My bet is, after a certain amount of time and keeping the infant to themselves, the public will lose interest just like the article says.

I am not so niave to understand that Brangelina love their position in Hollywood and will use their children as they see fit to promote their image. Nah, that is crystal clear.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:
Subject Author Date
Another point of view...LBF00:01:45 08/01/08 Fri


[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT-10
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.