Re: Hmm... -- Da Message Board

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, [9], 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 16:40:15 05/26/03 Mon
Author: Carms
Subject:

Re: Hmm...
In reply to: Tim 's message, "Hmm..." on 13:20:08 05/23/03 Fri

Ok, I actually enjoyed the first film. Yes it was wanky but I really liked it. I was expecting the same level of wank coupled with the same level of entertainment in the second flick, when instead I was overpowered by the annoying and there was only a little bit of cool good stuff. Having said that, i will go and see the third film, just coz I want to know how much wankier they can get. :o)

BTW - Leila, you're ideas for the third film are MAGIC! Especially the edition of Jay and Silent Bob - they'd be far more credible than that Lock guy. :o)

But Emma Caulfield and Bill Bailey - just a lil bit wrong.

Carms**********************

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]