VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 123[4]5678910 ]


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 06:36:39 12/05/02 Thu
Author: 道中人
Subject: Re: 貶德褒才並非取勝之道
In reply to: 辯論隊隊長蔡俊浩 's message, "對濟民道歉宣言" on 06:09:13 12/03/02 Tue

因為
1.整體不一定比成份重要:『道德是一種才能』推論不出才比德重要; 道理正如『某高官是某黑社會的一個成員』推論不出『某黑社會比某高官重要』。
2.『道德只是一種才能』更是片面真理,忽略了道德的行為都有某種利他的情感,
而利他的行為是罕有的,十分珍貴且令人敬佩;故道德不只是一種才能,而也是一種令人敬佩的品格。
3. 『道德只是為群體的生存繁衍而服務』推論不出道德不重要,因為,如果群體的生存繁衍是重要的話, 道德便是重要的。

小心, 『才能都是為物種的生存繁衍而服務』只是某一派科學家對物種生存繁衍的解釋; 但並非唯一的合理解釋; 有另一派的學者這樣說(大意如下):
『在億萬年的進化過程中,出現過千千萬萬的物種,有的才能有利於求生,有些不利於求生,即並非所有才能都是為物種的生存繁衍而服務,但適者生存不適者淘汰,擁有不利於求生才能的物種都已絕種,所以我們觀察現存的物種,就以為凡才能都是為物種的生存繁衍而服務,事實上,有些才能是不利於求生的, 例如恐龍的龐大身軀,打架時是頗有利於鬥撞,也算是有才之士吧?但身軀龐大,食物需求量也驚人啊, 恐龍如今安在哉? 』

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.