Re: Apologies -- SCAWC - Have your say!!

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, [4] ]

Subject: Re: Apologies

Author:
Greg

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 22:34:31 11/12/02 Tue
Author Host/IP: NoHost/203.185.254.130
In reply to: Sally 's message, "Re: Apologies" on 02:39:02 11/11/02 Mon

We registered these girls as U/18s, as they are U/18, although the plan was to allow them to play 3rd Grade due to a large number of U/18 girls registering. It came as a shock to see their names on the stats for the first few weeks of the comp and then they just disappeared. We obviously weren't well aware of this rule and have now found it in the 'awards eligibility' section. Could you explain the reasoning for the rule for players playing up as it is less obvious than for a player playing down, given that the other rules for eligibility would seem to cover any rorting of the awards.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Subject	Author	Date
Re: Apologies	Sally	04:59:40 11/13/02 Wed