VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1[2]34 ]
Subject: Re: Rove is toast!


Author:
Kathyrn
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 05:11:05 07/25/05 Mon
In reply to: NKLS Cody 's message, "Rove is toast!" on 18:26:47 07/22/05 Fri


>Hi Kathyrn! :) I guess now that
>you have read all of the right-wingding conspiracy
>theories some gun nut can fit on a page, we can bring
>up some of the facts. Rove & Scooter Libby are
>criminals and, just maybe, we will be allowed to see
>that these men are properly charged with what they
>have done and end up serving long sentences in an
>undisclosed federal corrections institution.
>
>Unlike Mr. X, the following information contains
>material that has been completely referenced and
>fact-checked several times:

>
> rel=nofollow target=_blank >href="http://www.yubanet.com/artman/publish/article_230
>80.shtml">http://www.yubanet.com/artman/publish/article
>_23080.shtml
>
>

Waxman: 11 Security Breaches in Plame Case


>
>Author: Rep. Henry Waxman
>Published on July 22, 2005, 14:25
>
>The disclosure of the covert identity of Valerie Plame
>Wilson in a July 14, 2003, column by Robert Novak has
>triggered a criminal investigation and led to calls
>for congressional investigations. The Novak column,
>however, appears to be only one of multiple leaks of
>Ms. Wilson's identity. A new fact sheet released today
>by Rep. Waxman documents that there appear to be at
>least 11 separate instances in which Administration
>officials disclosed information about Ms. Wilson's
>identity and association with the CIA.
>
>New Fact Sheet Details Multiple Administration
>Security Breaches Involving Valerie Plame Wilson
>
>On July 14, 2003, columnist Robert Novak revealed that
>the wife of Ambassador Joseph Wilson, Valerie Plame
>Wilson, was a covert CIA agent. This disclosure of
>classified information has triggered a criminal
>investigation by a Special Counsel and led to calls
>for congressional investigations.
>
>The Novak column, however, appears to be only one of
>multiple leaks of Ms. Wilson's identity. As this fact
>sheet documents, there appear to be at least 11
>separate instances in which Administration officials
>disclosed information about Ms. Wilson's identity and
>association with the CIA.
>
>Under Executive Order 12958, the White House is
>required to investigate any reports of security
>breaches and take "prompt corrective action," such as
>suspending the security clearances of those involved.
>Unlike prosecutions for criminal violations, which
>require "knowing" and "intentional" disclosures, the
>executive order covers a wider range of unauthorized
>breaches, including the "negligent" release of
>classified information. There is no evidence that the
>White House has complied with its obligation to
>investigate any of the 11 reported instances of
>security breaches relating to Ms. Wilson or to apply
>administrative sanctions to those involved.
>
>The Disclosures of Valerie Wilson's Identity
>
>1. The Disclosure by Karl Rove to Columnist Robert
>Novak
>In a column dated July 14, 2003, Robert Novak first
>reported that Valerie Plame Wilson was "an agency
>operative on weapons of mass destruction."1 Mr. Novak
>cited "two senior administration officials" as his
>sources.(2) According to multiple news reports, one of
>these two sources was Karl Rove, the Deputy White
>House Chief of Staff and the President's top political
>advisor.(3) During a phone call on July 8, 2003, Mr.
>Rove confirmed for Mr. Novak that Ms. Wilson worked at
>the CIA. During this conversation, Mr. Novak referred
>to Ms. Wilson "by her maiden name, Valerie Plame," and
>said he had heard she was involved in "the
>circumstances in which her husband … traveled to
>Africa."(4) Mr. Rove responded, "I heard that,
>too."(5) Mr. Novak's name also appeared "on a White
>House call log as having telephoned Mr. Rove in the
>week before the publication of the July 2003
>column."(6)
>
>2. The Disclosure by a "Senior Administration
>Official" to Columnist Robert Novak
>
>In addition to his communications with Mr. Rove, Mr.
>Novak learned about Ms. Wilson's identity through
>communications with a second "senior administration
>official."(7) Mr. Novak's second source has not yet
>been publicly identified. Mr. Novak has stated,
>however, that the source provided him with Ms.
>Wilson's identity. As he stated: "I didn't dig it out,
>it was given to me."(8) He added: "They thought it was
>significant, they gave me the name and I used it."(9)
>
>3. The Disclosure by Karl Rove to TIME Reporter Matt
>Cooper
>
>During a phone call on July 11, 2003, Mr. Rove
>revealed to TIME reporter Matt Cooper that Ms. Wilson
>worked at the CIA on weapons of mass destruction.(10)
>Mr. Cooper reported that this "was the first time I
>had heard anything about Wilson's wife."(11) Mr. Rove
>provided this information on "deep background," said
>that "things would be declassified soon," and stated,
>"I've already said too much."(12)
>
>4. The Disclosure by Scooter Libby to TIME Reporter
>Matt Cooper
>
>During a phone call on July 12, 2003, TIME reporter
>Matt Cooper asked the Vice President's chief of staff,
>I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby "if he had heard anything
>about Wilson's wife sending her husband to Niger."
>(13) Mr. Libby replied, "Yeah, I've heard that too,"
>or words to that effect.(14) Mr. Libby provided this
>information "on background."(15)
>
>5. The Disclosure by an "Administration Official" to
>Washington Post Reporter Walter Pincus
>On July 12, 2003, an "administration official" told
>Washington Post reporter Walter Pincus that "Wilson's
>trip to Niger was set up as a boondoggle by his
>CIA-employed wife."(16) Mr. Pincus has not publicly
>identified his source, but has stated that it "was not
>Libby."(17)
>
>6. The Disclosure by a "Top White House Official" to
>an Unidentified Reporter
>
>In addition making disclosures to Mr. Novak, Mr.
>Cooper, and Mr. Pincus, White House officials may have
>had conversations about Ms. Wilson with three other
>reporters about Ms. Wilson's identity. According to
>the Washington Post, a "senior administration
>official" confirmed that "before Novak's column ran on
>July 14, 2003, two top White House officials called at
>least six Washington journalists and disclosed the
>identity and occupation of Wilson's wife."(18)
>According to this official, "Clearly, it was meant
>purely and simply for revenge."(19) Press reports
>suggest that one of these unidentified reporters may
>be NBC correspondent Andrea Mitchell.(20)
>
>7. The Disclosure by a "Top White House Official" to
>an Unidentified Reporter
>
>In addition making disclosures to Mr. Novak, Mr.
>Cooper, and Mr. Pincus, White House officials may have
>had conversations about Ms. Wilson with three other
>reporters about Ms. Wilson's identity. According to
>the Washington Post, a "senior administration
>official" confirmed that "before Novak's column ran on
>July 14, 2003, two top White House officials called at
>least six Washington journalists and disclosed the
>identity and occupation of Wilson's wife."(21)
>According to this official, "Clearly, it was meant
>purely and simply for revenge."(22) Press reports
>suggest that one of these unidentified reporters may
>be NBC Meet the Press host Tim Russert.(23)
>
>8. The Disclosure by a "Top White House Official" to
>an Unidentified Reporter
>
>In addition making disclosures to Mr. Novak, Mr.
>Cooper, and Mr. Pincus, White House officials may have
>had conversations about Ms. Wilson with three other
>reporters about Ms. Wilson's identity. According to
>the Washington Post, a "senior administration
>official" confirmed that "before Novak's column ran on
>July 14, 2003, two top White House officials called at
>least six Washington journalists and disclosed the
>identity and occupation of Wilson's wife."(24)
>According to this official, "Clearly, it was meant
>purely and simply for revenge."25 Press reports
>suggest that one of these unidentified reporters may
>be MSNBC Hardball host Chris Matthews.(26)
>
>9. The Disclosure by an Unidentified Source to Wall
>Street Journal Reporter David Cloud
>
>On October 17, 2003, Wall Street Journal reporter
>David Cloud reported that an internal State Department
>memo prepared by U.S. intelligence personnel "details
>a meeting in early 2002 where CIA officer Valerie
>Plame and other intelligence officials gathered to
>brainstorm about how to verify reports that Iraq had
>sought uranium yellowcake from Niger."(27) This
>"classified" document had "limited circulation,"
>according to "two people familiar with the memo."(28)
>
>10. The Disclosure by an Unidentified Source to James
>Guckert of Talon News
>
>On October 28, 2003, Talon News posted on its website
>an interview with Ambassador Joseph Wilson in which
>the questioner asked: "An internal government memo
>prepared by U.S. intelligence personnel details a
>meeting in early 2002 where your wife, a member of the
>agency or clandestine service working on Iraqi weapons
>issues, suggested that you could be sent to
>investigate the reports. Do you dispute that?"(29)
>Talon News is tied to a group called GOP USA(30) and
>is operated by Texas Republican Robert Eberle.(31) Its
>only reporter, James Guckert (also known as Jeff
>Gannon), resigned when it was revealed that he gained
>access to the White House using a false name after his
>press credentials were rejected by House and Senate
>press galleries.(32) In a March 2004 interview with
>his own news service, Mr. Guckert stated that the
>classified document was "easily accessible."(33) In a
>February 11, 2005, interview with Wolf Blitzer of CNN,
>Mr. Guckert said the FBI interviewed him about "how I
>knew or received a copy of a confidential CIA memo,"
>but he refused to answer FBI questions because of his
>status as a "journalist."(34) A week later, Mr.
>Guckert changed his account, claiming he "was given no
>special information by the White House or by anybody
>else."(35)
>
>11. The Disclosure by a "Senior Administration
>Official" to Washington Post Reporters Mike Allen and
>Dana Milbank
>
>On December 26, 2003, Washington Post reporters Mike
>Allen and Dana Milbank reported on details about the
>classified State Department memo, writing that it was
>authored by "a State Department official who works for
>its Bureau of Intelligence and Research."(36) The Post
>story was attributed to "a senior administration
>official who has seen" the memo.(37) The Post also
>reported that the CIA was "angry about the circulation
>of a still-classified document to conservative news
>outlets" and that the CIA "believes that people in the
>administration continue to release classified
>information to damage the figures at the center of the
>controversy, former ambassador Joseph C. Wilson IV and
>his wife, Valerie Plame."(38)
>
>
>NOTES
>1 Robert Novak, The Mission to Niger, Chicago
>Sun-Times (July 14, 2003).
>2 Id.
>3 Rove Reportedly Held Phone Talk on CIA Officer, New
>York Times (July 15, 2005). See also Rove Confirmed
>Plame Indirectly, Lawyer Says, Washington Post (July
>15, 2005).
>4 Id.
>5 Id.
>6 Rove Confirmed Plame Indirectly, Lawyer Says,
>Washington Post (July 15, 2005).
>7 Robert Novak, The Mission to Niger, Chicago
>Sun-Times (July 14, 2003).
>8 Columnist Blows CIA Agent's Cover, Newsday (July 22,
>2003).
>9 Id.
>10 Matt Cooper, What I Told the Grand Jury, TIME (July
>25, 2005).
>11 Id.
>12 Id.
>13 Id.
>14 Id.
>15 Id.
>16 The When and How of Leak Being Probed, Washington
>Post (Nov. 26, 2004).
>17 Id.
>18 Bush Administration Is Focus of Inquiry; CIA
>Agent's Identity Was Leaked to Media, Washington Post
>(Sept. 28, 2003).
>19 Id.
>20 Secrets and Leaks, Newsweek (Oct. 13, 2003)
>(stating that she "heard in the White House that
>people were touting the Novak column and that that was
>the real story").
>21 Bush Administration Is Focus of Inquiry; CIA
>Agent's Identity Was Leaked to Media, Washington Post
>(Sept. 28, 2003).
>22 Id.
>23 Reporter Held in Contempt in CIA Leak Case,
>Washington Post (Aug. 10, 2004) (describing a July
>2003 telephone conversation between Mr. Russert and
>Mr. Libby).
>24 Bush Administration Is Focus of Inquiry; CIA
>Agent's Identity Was Leaked to Media, Washington Post
>(Sept. 28, 2003).
>25 Id.
>26 Secrets and Leaks, Newsweek (Oct. 13, 2003)
>(reportedly stating to Mr. Wilson, "I just got off the
>phone with Karl Rove, who said your wife was fair
>game").
>27 Memo May Aid Leak Probe, Wall Street Journal (Oct.
>17, 2003).
>28 Id.
>29 Leaks Probe Is Gathering Momentum, Washington Post
>(Dec. 26, 2003). See also Senate Intel Report
>Discredits Wilson's Claims About Iraq, Niger, Talon
>News (July 13, 2004) (confirming that Talon reported
>on the memo in October 2003).
>30 Leaks Probe Is Gathering Momentum, Washington Post
>(Dec. 26, 2003).
>31 Democrats Want Investigation of Reporter Using Fake
>Name, New York Times (Feb. 11, 2005).
>32 Id.
>33 Id.
>34 Rumsfeld Visits Iraq, CNN (Feb. 11, 2005).
>35 Anderson Cooper 360, CNN (Feb. 18, 2005). See also
>Web Site Owner Says He Knew of Reporter's 2
>Identities, New York Times (Feb. 20, 2005) (claiming
>that referring to the memo as though he had it was
>"merely an interview technique").
>36 Leaks Probe Is Gathering Momentum, Washington Post
>(Dec. 26, 2003).
>37 Id.
>38 Id.
>
>© Copyright 2005 by YubaNet.com
-----------------------------

I would hope that Rove would be punished for everything.
However, it is looking like something akin to purjury or obstruction of justice seem like more likely sought after charges.

It is often not the initial crime which is harder to prove that gets the prosecuters attention but charges that have to do with trying to cover it up which are so much easier to prove.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:
Subject Author Date
Re: ur answerNKLS Cody21:41:09 07/30/05 Sat


Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.