Create a New Forum Admin Login Member Login Contribute to Voyager Search VoyForums Help Desk VoyForums Exchange VoyForums Directory/Categories VoyForums Homepage VoyForums News FAQ - Frequently Asked Questions

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, [3], 4 ]

Subject: Re: Mel Gibson's "The Passion of the Christ," now that I've seen it Author: Kathyrn [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ] Date Posted: 05:25:33 03/20/04 Sat In reply to: Xpltivdletd 's message, "Re: Mel Gibson's "The Passion of the Christ," now that I've seen it" on 12:02:02 03/16/04 Tue >> >>Hey thanks for your review... >> >>I have not seen it yet. >> >>Though I have seen lots of clips of it. And found it >>interesting that he shot the movie with the actors >>speaking aramaic or Latin with subtitles.. >> >>That he had the actor that played christ speak the >>language that christ actually spoke is a plus. >> >>Like so many movies, I will more than likely wait >>till it comes out on dvd. > >We plan to buy that, too. Meanwhile, the >'coffee-table' book offered as a companion-piece to >the movie is at Sam's Club™ where they're >getting $14-something vice $24-something for it. Now >that it's made #2 on a certain newspaper's Best-Seller >list, it may be offered at a discount in other stores, >too. You might want to pick one up and put it up >until the DVD. We bought one copy and may buy a >couple more as gifts for like-minded relatives--having >examined the book. > >As this will put the thread to the top for a bit, >kindly indulge me--that case of the Utah woman up on >murder charges for declining a C-section is a curious >one, as is the case of the woman whose child was >stolen in PA with the kidnapping masked by a fire. I >won't bring either up again here unless someone else >is interested in discussing it. RKBA! Regards, all. ---- LOL I agree both cases are strange. I think the one with the kidnapped child masked by a arson is almost unbelievable... Can you imagine finding your child after all those years that is suppose to be dead? What a bloody miracle! In regards to the C-Section case... I hear they dropped the charges. Which well they should! There is no law that requires anyone to undergo surgery. Frankly, the woman did not look all that swift to me - but there is no crime against that. It does look like a number of people had it out for her. Since the one surviving child was immediately adopted I am wondering if someone had plans for the one that died and got pissed off at her for not undergoing the knife? [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Subject Author Date Those two cases I mentioned Xpltivdletd 21:29:15 03/20/04 Sat Re: Those two cases I mentioned -- Xpltivdletd, 22:56:04 03/28/04 Sun Re: with a hammer on 28 March 04... -- Infernal {expletive deleted} Server Error my R's, 08:25:30 09/22/04 Wed