VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, [4] ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 10:01:00 05/18/02 Sat
Author: Cabbie
Subject: If you believe in your heart that the DBL was 'better' than what Todd did to Tea ... there is NO point in any further discussion.
In reply to: Philosopher 's message, "Oh yes I am. I think the KK (AND the NUMEROUS other physically abuses Todd did to Tea) are FAR worse than the DBL. Physical abuse is far more dangerous (and representative of much more hatred) than pure psychological abuse. And I don't even think that the DBL was intended as abuse per se. Like I said, DBL was STOOPID Todd looking for a way to keep his family intact without having to parent the spawn of Max. He was NOT intent on abusing Blair in giving that baby away. He was STOOPID and needy, but in his odd way he did it because he LOVED & WANTED Blair. Same can't be said about the KK." on 09:58:38 05/18/02 Sat

We'll only end up calling each other names :)

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> HOLY SH*T!!!!! You're kidding, right??? And some people said you didn't have a sense of HUMOR. -- Cabbie, 10:05:43 05/18/02 Sat

GOOF!!!!!! That's all I got to say on the matter.


[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> No, I'm dead serious. Many may not agree with me, but I have SCIENCE behind what I say. -- Philosopher, 10:08:05 05/18/02 Sat


[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Oh this one I have to hear .... please, oh PLEASE tell me how B/t has science backing it ... LOL!! -- Cabbie Impressed with Phil the Comic, 10:09:57 05/18/02 Sat


[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Honestly I would (and will later on...), but I have to take kiddies to soccer. So bye for now (not a copout, really...I'll be back, you know I will....) -- Philosopher, 10:13:00 05/18/02 Sat


[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Phil has a wonderful sense of humor, it's best proven by this conversation that she's having with you. Sorry you had to leave, I'm bummed! MORE, Cabbie, MORE! -- OTWB, 14:09:43 05/18/02 Sat

>GOOF!!!!!! That's all I got to say on the matter.


[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> You're absolutely right!! I knew you were a smart cookie ;) P.S. I'm never leaving .... yippee!! -- Cabbie, 15:50:40 05/18/02 Sat


[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> There goes that old TnT *High Horse* kicking in. Well, if DBL is JUST AS BAD as KK, etc., then WHY OH WHY is the TnT fanbase so ardently awaiting TnT3????? They should be praying for Todd to die with a stake through his evil evil heart. -- Philosopher, 10:06:01 05/18/02 Sat


[ Edit | View ]
[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> For the same (@*#&*($& reason the B/ters are dying for the Messiah Manning Mass of Forgiveness!! Jeez, Phil!!! -- Cabbie, 10:08:36 05/18/02 Sat

There is NO difference here between the fanbases!! Get off YOUR high horse!


[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Oh Cabbie, Please! You all yelled and screeched with disgust about Todd ever since he came back and sloughed off the existence of the troll. How many times have I seen, "I WOULDN'T HAVE THIS TODD FOR OUR GIRL"! Well, you're dying to get Todd for your girl anyway you can. Problem is, he doesn't want your girl! -- Lafaux, 11:08:26 05/18/02 Sat


[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Lafaux ... -- Cabbie, 11:32:43 05/18/02 Sat

I don't think you're a moron. So I apologize if you're offended by what I wrote (I told you NOT to be one ... not that you WERE one). I was speaking tongue in cheek and was still under the influence of Candy's post where she was referring to some group of people looking like morons.

Anyways ... I'm sort of done here ... I see all the same arguments going back and forth and my opinion is as firmly in place as when I started. NOBODY is in a position to claim some kind of superiority based on the stupid-ass storyline they've been given and based on THEIR interpretation of it. And they definitely cannot claim superiority because "we didn't act like THEY did."

All's well ... carry on :)


[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> I don't give a damn who's "morally superior" If I wanted to be "morally superior", then I'd probably find something more worthy to do with my time then yammer about some damn soap opera! Different strokes for different folks, I guess. -- OTWB, 12:29:15 05/18/02 Sat

>I don't think you're a moron. So I apologize if
>you're offended by what I wrote (I told you NOT to be
>one ... not that you WERE one). I was speaking tongue
>in cheek and was still under the influence of Candy's
>post where she was referring to some group of people
>looking like morons.
>
>Anyways ... I'm sort of done here ... I see all the
>same arguments going back and forth and my opinion is
>as firmly in place as when I started. NOBODY is in a
>position to claim some kind of superiority based on
>the stupid-ass storyline they've been given and based
>on THEIR interpretation of it. And they definitely
>cannot claim superiority because "we didn't act like
>THEY did."
>
>All's well ... carry on :)


[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> IA Cabbie... -- Lou, 10:07:02 05/18/02 Sat

It is pointless. When you cut through the bull all Phil just said is that Todd gave the kid away because he LOVED Blair.


[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Exactly, Lou. -- Cabbie, 10:12:12 05/18/02 Sat

And we're all only going to end up calling each other names.


[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Borsht circuit routine...Cabbie crys and Lou blows...No need for names, you all know your names too well,Phil wasn't mired in BULL. Todd gave the baby away because it wasn't his. He is a conceited sociopath that we find at all palatable because of the attractive face and unbelievable talent of RH. -- A7, 21:47:41 05/19/02 Sun

Todd regressed with Tehag.....they did not communicate on any level....He tried to find ways to manipulate her, to keep her quiet, keep her IN on the fraud.....did not want to open to her as a partner,,,,,,she flitted from person to person. He found it difficult at all.....Early Todd did and said all the "right" things to GET the girl.... A jock mentality married to repressed anger eventually blew. His early convo with Zach in the cafeteria showed that. With Blair it was the first time he actually LIKED, then LOVED someone who he slept with. With hag, he wnet back to this neanderthal man behaviour....He actually smacked and punched and abused her.
This was very bad.


[ Edit | View ]


[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.